Resource scarcity and priority setting: from management to leadership in the rationing of health care?
Access Status
Fulltext not available
Authors
Dickinson, H.
Freeman, T.
Robinson, Suzanne
Williams, I.
Date
2011Type
Journal Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Dickinson, H. and Freeman, T. and Robinson, S. and Williams, I. 2011. Resource scarcity and priority setting: from management to leadership in the rationing of health care? Public Money and Management September. 31 (5): pp. 363-370.
Source Title
Public Money and Management September
School
Department of Health Policy and Management
Collection
Abstract
While continued interest in the application of priority-setting technologies is perhaps unsurprising in a time of austerity, they require sensitive implementation for their full potential benefits to be realized. This article looks at the role and value of leadership in addressing problems of a lack of perceived legitimacy and governance that have been raised in connection with the rationing enterprise. The potential and limitations of key leadership concepts such as ‘sense-making’ and ‘framing’ are explored, and notions of relational leadership and the importance of leading with political astuteness are discussed.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Kotlyar, I.; Richardson, Julia; Karakowsky, L. (2015)Purpose – An increasingly popular method of facilitating employee and leadership development is via a career community (Parker et al., 2004), where individuals self-organize to obtain career support. This study was driven ...
-
Levine, M.; Boaks, Jacqueline (2014)© 2013, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. Accounts of leadership in relation to ethics can and do go wrong in several ways that may lead us too quickly into thinking there is a tighter relationship between ethics ...
-
Jefferson, Therese; Klass, Des; Lord, Linley; Nowak, Margaret; Thomas, Gail (2014)Purpose: Leadership studies which focus on categorising leadership styles have been critiqued for failure to consider the lived experience of leadership. The purpose of this paper is to use the framework of Jepson’s model ...