Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAl Shuhaimi, A.
dc.contributor.authorAbabtain, K.
dc.contributor.authorSun, Zhonghua
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T15:19:13Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T15:19:13Z
dc.date.created2010-01-20T20:02:00Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationAl Shuhaimi, Ahmed and Ababtain, Khalid and Sun, Zhonghua. 2009. Diagnostic value of non-invasive imaging techniques in the detection of carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review. The Radiographer 56 (3): pp. 14-18.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/45192
dc.description.abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of non- invasive imaging methods of detecting carotid artery stenosis in comparison to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) by undertaking a systematic review of the literature. The non-invasive methods reviewed include multislice computed tomography (MSCT) angiography, duplex ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography.A search of medical databases (PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect, Proquest) of the English literature was performed and 22 studies with 68 comparisons were found to meet the selection criteria and included in our study. 5 studies were performed with MSCT angiography, 11 with duplex US and 13 with MR angiography. Both duplex US and MR angiography were studied in 7 out of 24 US and MR studies. The diagnostic value of each imaging modality was reviewed in terms of the sensitivity and specificity compared to DSA, which is regarded as the standard method.The mean sensitivity and specificity for MSCT angiography, duplex US and MR angiography were 88% (95% CI: 83%, 92%) and 90% (95% CI: 85%, 94%), 88% (95% CI: 81%, 94%) and 89% (95% CI: 85%, 94%), 94% (95% CI: 90%, 97%) and 89% (95% CI: 85%, 92%), respectively based on overall assessment. The evaluation showed that contrast-enhanced MR angiography has high diagnostic value for detection of more than 50% stenosis of carotid artery stenosis with mean sensitivity and specificity being 95% (95% CI: 92%, 98%) and 91% (95% CI: 86% 95%). When assessment was based on a combination of MR angiography and duplex US, the sensitivity reached the highest value of 98% (95% CI: 96%, 100%). This analysis indicates that MR angiography, especially contrast-enhanced MR angiography could be used as a reliable alternative modality to DSA in the detection of carotid artery stenosis.

dc.publisherAustralian Institute of Radiography
dc.subjectAngiography
dc.subjectComputed tomography angiography
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance angiography
dc.subjectCarotid artery disease
dc.subjectUltrasound
dc.titleDiagnostic value of non-invasive imaging techniques in the detection of carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume56
dcterms.source.number3
dcterms.source.startPage14
dcterms.source.endPage18
dcterms.source.issn00338273
dcterms.source.titleThe Radiographer
curtin.note

© The Australian Institute of Radiography. The Australian Institute of Radiography website is available at http://www.air.asn.au/

curtin.note

Access to the journal The Radiographer is available from www.minniscomms.com.au/radiographer/

curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultySchool of Science and Computing
curtin.facultyFaculty of Science and Engineering
curtin.facultyDepartment of Imaging and Applied Physics


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record