Australian education journals: quantitative and qualitative indicators
Access Status
Authors
Date
2009Type
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Source Title
ISSN
Faculty
Remarks
Originally published by the Australian Library and Information Association in Australian Academic and Research Libraries 40 (2): pp. 88-104.
Collection
Abstract
This paper reports on a study which applied citation-based measures to Australian education journals. Citations data were drawn from two sources, Web of Science and Scopus, and these data were used to calculate each journal's impact factor, h-index, and diffusion factor. The rankings resulting from these analyses were compared with draft rankings assigned to the journals for Excellence for Research in Australia (ERA). Scopus emerged as the citation source most advantageous to these journals and some consistency across the citation-based measures was found.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Hosseini, Mohammad; Eve, Martin Paul; Gordijn, Bert; Neylon, Cameron (2020)Background: Inaccurate citations are erroneous quotations or instances of paraphrasing of previously published material that mislead readers about the claims of the cited source. They are often unaddressed due to ...
-
Kozyrskyj, A.; Kendall, Garth; Zubrick, Stephen; Newnham, J.; Sly, Peter (2009)Frequent nocturnal awakening in early life is associated with nonatopic asthma in children Holdings more options Author(s): Kozyrskyj AL (Kozyrskyj, A. L.)1,2, Kendall GE (Kendall, G. E.)3,4,6, Zubrick SR ...
-
Chang, C.; McAleer, M.; Oxley, Leslie (2011)The paper is concerned with analysing what makes a great journal great in the sciences, based on quantifiable Research Assessment Measures (RAM). Alternative RAM are discussed, with an emphasis on the Thomson Reuters ISI ...