Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSale, C.
dc.contributor.authorHalkett, Georgia
dc.contributor.authorCox, J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T15:21:22Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T15:21:22Z
dc.date.created2016-07-05T19:30:40Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationSale, C. and Halkett, G. and Cox, J. 2016. National survey on the practice of radiation therapists in Australia. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 63 (2): pp. 104-113.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/45516
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jmrs.155
dc.description.abstract

Introduction: Radiation therapy (RT), like many allied health professions, has lacked professional practice clarity, which until 2008 had not been comprehensively investigated. This manuscript describes the first phase of a three-phase project investigating the current and future practices of radiation therapists (RTs) in Australia. The aim of phase 1 was to define the practice of RTs in Australia. Methods: A quantitative approach was used to gain an understanding of RT practice. A national survey was distributed to RTs in Australia. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to analyse the data. RT practice was analysed in relation to core and non-core roles, where non-core roles were further divided into basic and advanced practices. Results: The data from the national survey were representative of the Australian RT population (n = 525). The current practice of RTs is presented in summary tables for each area of work (treatment, planning, simulation, mould room and general). Conclusion: This study provided clarification of RT practice and indicated there was a desire to relinquish administrative roles to focus on RT–specific practice. There was evidence that some advanced roles were currently practiced in Australia; however, there was no structure to support these roles and they were based only on local need. This study identified that the profession needs to consider how they will maintain core RT practice, while encouraging the development of new roles, and whether some roles need to be relinquished.

dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons
dc.titleNational survey on the practice of radiation therapists in Australia
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume63
dcterms.source.number2
dcterms.source.startPage104
dcterms.source.endPage113
dcterms.source.issn2051-3909
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Medical Radiation Sciences
curtin.note

This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

curtin.departmentSchool of Nursing and Midwifery
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record