Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcKenzie, Fiona Haslam
dc.contributor.authorPini, Barbara
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T15:27:37Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T15:27:37Z
dc.date.created2008-11-12T23:25:07Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationMcKenzie, Fiona and Pini, Barbara. 2006. Challenging local government notions of community engagement as unnecessary, unwanted and unproductive: Case studies from rural Australia. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 8 (1): 27-44.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/46493
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15239080600634078
dc.description.abstract

Despite the fact that sustainability is typically viewed as being dependent upon community engagement at the local level, this paper reveals that there has been a limited emphasis on community involvement in environmental management in rural local government areas in Australia. Using interviews with 67 council staff and elected members from 15 rural government case study sites across four states in Australia, the paper documents the ways in which a lack of emphasis on community participation is legitimized and rationalized by rural local governments. Three key arguments are made by participants. The first is that community engagement is irrelevant in rural areas as the small population means that people have ready daily access to their councillors and that, in turn, councillors have an intimate knowledge of their constituents' interests and concerns. The second is that community engagement for sustainability is unwanted by rural residents who prioritize economic development concerns above the environment. The third rationale given by research participants to justify limited community engagement is that the practice is unproductive. The contention made is that involving community is time-consuming, costly and typically produces little relevant tangible outcomes. The paper concludes by countering these arguments, while acknowledging that rural local governments do face particular financial and human resource limitations in relation to community engagement.

dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.subjectenvironment
dc.subjectplanning
dc.subjectcommunity
dc.subjectAustralia
dc.subjectlcoal government
dc.titleChallenging local government notions of community engagement as unnecessary, unwanted and unproductive: Case studies from rural Australia
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume8
dcterms.source.number1
dcterms.source.startPage27
dcterms.source.endPage44
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Environmental Policy and Planning
curtin.departmentAustralian Housing and Urban Research Institute (National Centre)
curtin.identifierEPR-903
curtin.identifierDEL-HUM-AHI-FM-33231
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available
curtin.facultyHousing and Urban Research Institute of Western Australia
curtin.facultyResearch Centres
curtin.facultyCurtin
curtin.facultyCentres of Excellence


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record