Kronic hysteria: Exploring the intersection between Australian synthetic cannabis legislation, the media, and drug-related harm
MetadataShow full item record
Background Having first appeared in Europe, synthetic cannabis emerged as a drug of concern in Australia during 2011. Kronic is the most well-known brand of synthetic cannabis in Australia and received significant media attention. Policy responses were reactive and piecemeal between state and federal governments. In this paper we explore the relationship between media reports, policy responses, and drug-related harm. Methods Google search engine applications were used to produce time–trend graphs detailing the volume of media stories being published online about synthetic cannabis and Kronic, and also the amount of traffic searching for these terms. A discursive analysis was then conducted on those media reports that were identified by Google as ‘key stories’. The timing of related media stories was also compared with self-reported awareness and month of first use, using previously unpublished data from a purposive sample of Australian synthetic cannabis users. Results Between April and June 2011, mentions of Kronic in the media increased. The number of media stories published online connected strongly with Google searches for the term Kronic. These stories were necessarily framed within dominant discourses that served to construct synthetic cannabis as pathogenic and created a ‘moral panic’. Australian state and federal governments reacted to this moral panic by banning individual synthetic cannabinoid agonists. Manufacturers subsequently released new synthetic blends that they claimed contained new unscheduled chemicals. Conclusion Policies implemented within in the context of ‘moral panic’, while well-intended, can result in increased awareness of the banned product and the use of new yet-to-be-scheduled drugs with unknown potential for harm. Consideration of regulatory models should be based on careful examination of the likely intended and unintended consequences. Such deliberation might be limited by the discursive landscape.
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in the International Journal of Drug Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in the International Journal of Drug Policy, Vol. 24 (2013). DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.12.002
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Attitudes of cannabis growers to regulation of cannabis cultivation under a non-prohibition cannabis modelLenton, Simon; Frank, V.; Barratt, Monica; Dahl, H.; Potter, G. (2015)Background: How cannabis cultivation is dealt with under various examples of cannabis legalization or regulation is an important consideration in design of such schemes. This study aimed to (i) investigate support among ...
Attitudes of cannabis growers to regulation of cannabis cultivation under a non-prohibition cannabis modelLenton, Simon; Frank, V.; Barratt, Monica; Dahl, H.; Potter, G. (2014)Background: How cannabis cultivation is dealt with under various examples of cannabis legalization or regulation is an important consideration in design of such schemes. This study aimed to (i) investigate support among ...
Silins, E.; Horwood, J.; Patton, G.; Fergusson, D.; Olsson, C.; Hutchinson, D.; Spry, E.; Toumbourou, J.; Degenhardt, L.; Swift, W.; Coffey, C.; Tait, Robert; Letcher, P.; Copeland, J.; Mattick, R.; Allsop, Steve; Hall, W.; Hayatbakhsh, R.; Little, K.; Najman, J.; Skinner, R.; Slade, T. (2014)Background: Debate continues about the consequences of adolescent cannabis use. Existing data are limited in statistical power to examine rarer outcomes and less common, heavier patterns of cannabis use than those already ...