Disability's Digital Frictions: Activism, Technology and Politics
MetadataShow full item record
This paper argues that disability activism and politics can be seen as paradigmatic for the wider debates on the philosophies, forms, and formats embedded in technologies. Firstly, the paper discusses disability activism movements that use digital technology to intervene into digital technology, especially in the social media area. In both cases, activists seek to use the platforms themselves to argue for, and obtain, greater accessibility, customisability, and configurability, of the platform for users with disabilities. Yet there is a clear clash between philosophies embedded within these social media platforms, and the aspirations and values of many of the activist strands of disability. Secondly, the paper explores the use of digital technologies by disability activism movements in relation to welfare and work reforms—notably the UK struggles in the 2010–2014 periods. Here disability activists have made extensive use of digital media technologies, and we discuss their innovations, and the lessons they offer.
This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Kent, Michael; Ellis, Katie; Peaty, Gwyneth; Latter, Natalie; Locke, Kathryn (2017)Captions can be defined as the text version of speech and other sound in traditional audio visual media such as films, television, DVDs and online videos. Captions are usually provided to enhance audio content and are ...
The Disability Divide: a study into the impact of computing and internet-related technologies on people who are blind or vision-impairedHollier, Scott (2006)People with disabilities, and in particular people who are blind or vision impaired, are not embracing computing and Internet-related technologies at the same rate as the able-bodied population. The purpose of this study ...
Ellis, Katie (2012)Christopher Newell was both optimistic and sceptical regarding the potential of digital technologies and advanced telecommunications to assist individuals with disability (Newell 1998, Goggin & Newell 2000, Goggin & ...