Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, J.
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T15:34:22Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T15:34:22Z
dc.date.created2015-07-30T20:01:30Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationRibeiro, J. and Douglas, M. 2015. Transparency in investor-state arbitration: the way forward. Asian International Arbitration Journal. 11 (1): pp. 49-67.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/47596
dc.description.abstract

The push for transparency in investor-State arbitration is gaining momentum. In July 2013 the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) adopted the UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration. (1) In December 2014 the General Assembly adopted the United Nations Convention on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration (Mauritius Convention on Transparency), (2) providing a streamlined mechanism for States to adopt the Rules on Transparency. These developments are part of a welcomed trend towards transparency in investor-State page "49" arbitration. (3) This article explains why transparency of investor-State arbitration is so important, why the Rules on Transparency should be widely adopted, and how the Mauritius Convention on Transparency can make that happen.

dc.publisherKluwer Law International
dc.relation.urihttp://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=kli-ka-aiaj-2015-11-002-n
dc.titleTransparency in investor-state arbitration: the way forward
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume11
dcterms.source.startPage49
dcterms.source.endPage68
dcterms.source.issn15743330
dcterms.source.titleAsian International Arbitration Journal
curtin.note

Reprinted from International Arbitration Journal, Volume 11, Issue 1, 2015, pp. 49-67, with permission of Kluwer Law International.

curtin.departmentCurtin Law School
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record