Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKeatley, David
dc.contributor.authorChan, Derwin K.C.
dc.contributor.authorCaudwell, Kim
dc.contributor.authorChatzisarantis, Nikos
dc.contributor.authorHagger, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T15:34:28Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T15:34:28Z
dc.date.created2015-10-29T04:09:01Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationKeatley, D. and Chan, D. and Caudwell, K. and Chatzisarantis, N. and Hagger, M. 2015. A consideration of what is meant by automaticity and better ways to measure it. Frontiers in Psychology. 5: 1537.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/47618
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01537
dc.description.abstract

A commentary on 'Predicting automaticity in exercise behaviour: the role of perceived behavioural control, affect, intention, action planning, and behaviour' by de Bruijn, G.-J., Gardner, B., van Osch, L., and Sniehotta, F. (2014). Int. J. Behav. Med. 21, 767–774. doi: 10.1007/s12529-013-9348-4

dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundation
dc.titleA consideration of what is meant by automaticity and better ways to measure it
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume6
dcterms.source.numberJAN
dcterms.source.titleFrontiers in Psychology
curtin.note

This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

curtin.departmentSchool of Psychology and Speech Pathology
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record