Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarshall, J.
dc.contributor.authorRoper, A.
dc.contributor.authorGalliers, J.
dc.contributor.authorWilson, S.
dc.contributor.authorCocks, Naomi
dc.contributor.authorMuscroft, S.
dc.contributor.authorPring, T.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T15:34:31Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T15:34:31Z
dc.date.created2013-09-11T20:00:29Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationMarshall, J and Roper, Abi and Galliers, Julia and Wilson, Stephanie and Cocks, Naomi and Muscroft, Sam and Pring, Tim. 2013. Computer delivery of gesture therapy for people with severe aphasia. Aphasiology. 27 (9): pp. 1128-1146.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/47627
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02687038.2013.786803
dc.description.abstract

Background: Using gesture as a compensatory communication strategy may be challenging for people with severe aphasia. Therapy can improve skills with gesture, at least in elicitation tasks, but gains ar often modest. Raising the treatment dose with technology might improve outcomes. Aims: This feasibility study developed a computer gesture therapy tool (GeST), and piloted it with nine people who have severe aphasia. It aimed to determine whether practice with GeST would improve gesture production and/or spoken naming. It also explored whether GeST encouraged independent practice and was easy to use. Methods & Procedures: Pilot participants had 6 weeks practice with GeST, flanked by pre- and post-therapy tests of gesture and word production. Usability was explored through interviews and structured observations, and the amount of time spent in the programme was monitored. Outcomes & Results: Scores on the gesture test were evaluated by 36 independent raters. Recognition scores for gestures practised with the tool improved significantly after therapy and the gain was maintained. However, gains were small and only occurred on items that were practised with regular therapist support. There was no generalisation to unpractised gestures and no effect on spoken naming. Usability results were positive. Participants undertook an average of 64.4 practice sessions with GeST, and the average session length was just under 14 minutes. Conclusions: GeST was proved to be easy and enjoyable to use and had some effect on participants’ gesturing skills. Increasing the magnitude of gains would be desirable. The effect on everyday communication needs to be explored.

dc.publisherPsychology Press (Taylor & Francis Group)
dc.titleComputer delivery of gesture therapy for people with severe aphasia
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume27
dcterms.source.number9
dcterms.source.startPage1128
dcterms.source.endPage1146
dcterms.source.issn1464-5041
dcterms.source.titleAphasiology
curtin.note

This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in Aphasiology (2013), copyright Taylor & Francis, available online at: <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02687038.2013.786803">http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02687038.2013.786803</a>

curtin.departmentof Technlogy
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record