Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoyle, E.
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, R.
dc.contributor.authorDrury, Vicki
dc.identifier.citationBoyle, E. and Saunders, R. and Drury, V. 2016. A qualitative study of patient experiences of Type 2 Diabetes care delivered comparatively by General Practice Nurses and Medical Practitioners. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 25 (13-14): pp. 1977-1986.

Aims and objectives: To explore patient experiences of type 2 diabetes mellitus care delivered by general practice nurses in collaboration with the general practitioner. Background Australian general practice nurses are expanding their role in multidisciplinary type 2 diabetes care with limited research on patient perceptions of care provision within this collaborative model. Design Qualitative interpretive. Methods: Purposeful sampling was used to invite the patients (n = 10). Data were collected from semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Braun and Clarke's (2006) inductive coding thematic analysis process was used to interpret the data. Results: All participants experienced their General Practice Nurse consultation as a clinical assessment for their General Practitioner. While they appreciated the extra time with the General Practice Nurse, they were unsure of the purpose of the consultation beyond clinical assessment. They described the ongoing challenge of living with T2DM and identified a need for additional information and advice. Conclusion: The results suggest that the model of general practice nurse type 2 diabetes care has an important role to play in the delivery of effective ongoing care of patients. However, this role requires further development to ensure that it is understood by the patients as a role that not only conducts clinical assessments but also provides relevant education and self-management support as part of a collaborative approach to care delivery with General Practitioners.

dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing
dc.titleA qualitative study of patient experiences of Type 2 Diabetes care delivered comparatively by General Practice Nurses and Medical Practitioners
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Clinical Nursing
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record