Using Deliberative Techniques to Engage the Community in Policy Development: A Case Study
MetadataShow full item record
Background: This paper examines work in deliberative approaches to community enagement used in Western Australia by the Department of Planning and Infrastructure and other planning and infrastructure agencies between 2001 and 2005, and considers whether the techniques could be applied to the development of health policy in Australia. Results: Deliberative processes were used in WA to address specific planning and infrastructure problems. Using deliberative techniques, community participants contributed to joint decision making and policy development. Outcomes from deliberative processes were seriously considered by the Minister and used to influence policy decisions. In many cases, the recommendations generated through deliberative processes were fully adopted by the Minister. Conclusion: The experiences in WA demonstrate that deliberative engagement processes can be successfully implemented by government and can be used to guide policy. The techniques can be adapted to suit the context and issues experienced by a portfolio, and the skills required to conduct deliberative processes can be fostered amongst the portfolio's staff. Health policy makers may be able to learn from the experiences in WA, and adopt approaches to community engagement that allow for informed deliberation and debate in the community about the future of Australia's health system.
This article is published under the Open Access publishing model and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Please refer to the licence to obtain terms for any further reuse or distribution of this work.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Informing public health policy through deliberative public engagement: Perceived impact on participants and citizen-government relationsMolster, C.; Potts, A.; McNamara, Beverley; Youngs, L.; Maxwell, S.; Dawkins, Hugh; O'Leary, Peter (2013)Background: Deliberative public engagement has been proposed for policy development, where issues are complex and there are diverse public perspectives and low awareness of competing issues. Scholars suggest a range of ...
Petrova, Svetla; Pope, J. (2013)One of the biggest challenges for the mining industry has been securing its licence to operate, both at the level of individual mining developments and across the industry as a whole. Once a legal licence to operate has ...
Blueprint for a deliberative public forum on biobanking policy: Were theoretical principles achievable in practice?Molster, C.; Maxwell, Susannah; Youngs, L.; Kyne, G.; Hope, F.; Dawkins, Hugh; O'Leary, Peter (2013)Background: Public deliberation is recommended for obtaining citizen input to policy development when policies involve contested ethical dimensions, diverse perspectives on how to trade-off competing public interests ...