Assessing the relative value of domain knowledge for civil society's libraries: the role of core collections
MetadataShow full item record
Core collections were once at the heart of assessment of a public library's ability to meet users' needs. The commitment to valuable public knowledge has receded over time based upon postmodern readings of what this concept might mean and a move toward a user-centred paradigm within LIS. Working within a knowledge organisation framework that problematises how users' definitions of value are assessed, this paper looks to how core collections can still have relevance within a framework of knowledge that has become increasingly context-laden and contingently based. The question of how value across domains is conceptualised and implemented is investigated with an aim to contribute to a hermeneutically-grounded method of selection that can aid users in finding the best materials to support self-guided learning. This research aims to explicate why certain domains should be prioritised for civil society settings; what range and depth should be invoked in the process of selection and evaluation and what is the nature of subjective choice in delineating a balance between a core collection and the broader non-fiction collection. The research is grounded in hermeneutical phenomenology and a desire to see librarianship as, primarily, a human science, or at least a philosophically-informed humanistic endeavour. It looks to Betti's objectivist approach to interpretation of Geisteswissenschaften as a guide to understanding how library and information science balances one of its core assessment tasks: defining subject priority. This research outlines why scientific subjects should be apportioned a sublimated priority in civil society collections, but also that primarily the defining aspect of civil society collections is how they deal with the need to balance science, humanistic knowledge and the practical, technical and applied topicality that users require. The research reveals that the unravelling of these meta-categories is not as straightforward as might be supposed.
The following license files are associated with this item:
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Kelly, Matthew (2018)Purpose: This paper aims to problematise the basis of the use of non-fiction as an explanatory category in libraries that have mandates to deliver information to civil society users to initiate debate on its ongoing value. ...
Kelly, Matthew (2015)How selection of materials, understood as subject knowledge, should occur for non-fiction collections in public libraries has been polarized along an axis of user demand and intellectual rigor for many decades. Attempts ...
‘Is the library open?’: Correlating unaffiliated access to academic libraries with open access supportWilson, Katie ; Neylon, Cameron ; Brookes-Kenworthy, Chloe ; Hosking, Richard ; Huang, Karl ; Montgomery, Lucy ; Ozaygen, Alkim (2019)© 2019, Igitur, Utrecht Publishing and Archiving Services. All rights reserved. In the context of a growing international focus on open access publishing options and mandates, this paper explores the extent to which the ...