Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPlimpton, S.
dc.contributor.authorGale, Julian
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T10:42:23Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T10:42:23Z
dc.date.created2013-12-11T04:18:01Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationPlimpton, Steven J. and Gale, Julian D. 2013. Developing community codes for materials modeling. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science. 17 (6): pp. 271-276.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/4898
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cossms.2013.09.005
dc.description.abstract

For this article, we call scientific software a community code if it is freely available, written by a team of developers who welcome user input, and has attracted users beyond the developers. There are obviously many such materials modeling codes. The authors have been part of such efforts for many years in the field of atomistic simulation, specifically for two community codes, the LAMMPS and GULP packages for molecular dynamics and lattice dynamics respectively. Here we highlight lessons we have learned about how to create such codes and the pros and cons of being part of a community effort. Many of our experiences are similar, but we also have some differences of opinion (like modeling vs modelling). Our hope is that readers will find these lessons useful as they design, implement, and distribute their own materials modelling software for others to use.

dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectLattice dynamics
dc.subjectForce fields
dc.subjectMolecular dynamics
dc.subjectMaterials modeling
dc.subjectOpen source software
dc.titleDeveloping community codes for materials modeling
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume17
dcterms.source.number6
dcterms.source.startPage271
dcterms.source.endPage276
dcterms.source.issn1359-0286
dcterms.source.titleCurrent Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science
curtin.note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science, Vol. 17, No. 6 (2013). DOI: 10.1016/j.cossms.2013.09.005

curtin.department
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record