Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFary, Robyn
dc.contributor.authorCarroll, G.
dc.contributor.authorBriffa, T.
dc.contributor.authorBriffa, Kathy
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-15T22:06:20Z
dc.date.available2017-03-15T22:06:20Z
dc.date.created2017-02-24T00:09:09Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationFary, R. and Carroll, G. and Briffa, T. and Briffa, K. 2011. The Effectiveness of Pulsed Electrical Stimulation in the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Repeated-Measures Trial. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 63 (5): pp. 1333-1342.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/49619
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/art.30258
dc.description.abstract

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of subsensory, pulsed electrical stimulation (PES) in the symptomatic management of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Methods: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, repeated-measures trial in 70 participants with clinical and radiographically diagnosed OA of the knee who were randomized to either PES or placebo. The primary outcome was change in pain score over 26 weeks measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Other measures included pain on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), function on the WOMAC, patient's global assessment of disease activity (on a 100-mm VAS), joint stiffness on the WOMAC, quality of life on the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36) health survey, physical activity (using the Human Activity Profile and an accelerometer), and global perceived effect (on an 11-point scale). Results: Thirty-four participants were randomized to PES and 36 to placebo. Intent-to-treat analysis showed a statistically significant improvement in VAS pain score over 26 weeks in both groups, but no difference between groups (mean change difference 0.9 mm [95% confidence interval −11.7, 13.4]). Similarly, there were no differences between groups for changes in WOMAC pain, function, and stiffness scores (−5.6 [95% confidence interval −14.9, 3.6], −1.9 [95% confidence interval −9.7, 5.9], and 3.7 [95% confidence interval −6.0, 13.5], respectively), SF-36 physical and mental component summary scores (1.7 [95% confidence interval −1.5, 4.8] and 1.2 [95% confidence interval −2.9, 5.4], respectively), patient's global assessment of disease activity (−2.8 [95% confidence interval −13.9, 8.4]), or activity measures. Fifty-six percent of the PES-treated group achieved a clinically relevant 20-mm improvement in VAS pain score at 26 weeks compared with 44% of controls (12% [95% confidence interval −11%, 33%]). Conclusion: In this sample of subjects with mild-to-moderate symptoms and moderate-to-severe radiographic OA of the knee, 26 weeks of PES was no more effective than placebo.

dc.publisherWiley
dc.titleThe Effectiveness of Pulsed Electrical Stimulation in the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Repeated-Measures Trial
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume63
dcterms.source.number5
dcterms.source.startPage1333
dcterms.source.endPage1342
dcterms.source.issn15290131
dcterms.source.titleArthritis and Rheumatism
curtin.departmentSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science
curtin.accessStatusOpen access via publisher


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record