Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGaither, M.
dc.contributor.authorSchultz, J.
dc.contributor.authorBellwood, D.
dc.contributor.authorPyle, R.
dc.contributor.authorDi Battista, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorRocha, L.
dc.contributor.authorBowen, B.
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-15T22:16:22Z
dc.date.available2017-03-15T22:16:22Z
dc.date.created2017-02-26T19:31:36Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationGaither, M. and Schultz, J. and Bellwood, D. and Pyle, R. and Di Battista, J. and Rocha, L. and Bowen, B. 2014. Evolution of pygmy angelfishes: Recent divergences, introgression, and the usefulness of color in taxonomy. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 74 (1): pp. 38-47.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/49796
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ympev.2014.01.017
dc.description.abstract

The pygmy angelfishes (genus Centropyge, family Pomacanthidae) are brightly colored species that occupy reef habitats in every tropical ocean. Some species are rarely observed because they occur below conventional scuba depths. Their striking coloration can command thousands of U.S. dollars in the aquarium trade, and closely related species are often distinguished only by coloration. These factors have impeded phylogenetic resolution, and every phylogeographic survey to date has reported discordance between coloration, taxonomy, and genetic partitions. Here we report a phylogenetic survey of 29 of the 34 recognized species (N= 94 plus 23 outgroups), based on two mtDNA and three nuclear loci, totaling 2272. bp. The resulting ML and Baysian trees are highly concordant and indicate that the genus Centropyge is paraphyletic, consistent with a previous analysis of the family Pomacanthidae. Two recognized genera (Apolemichthys and Genicanthus) nest within Centropyge, and two subgenera (Xiphypops and Paracentropyge) comprise monophyletic lineages that should be elevated to genus level. Based on an age estimate of 38. Ma for the family Pomacanthidae, Centropyge diverged from the closest extant genus Pygoplites about 33. Ma, three deep lineages within Centropyge diverged about 18-28. Ma, and four species complexes diverged 3-12. Ma. However, in 11 of 13 cases, putative species in these complexes are indistinguishable based on morphology and genetics, being defined solely by coloration. These cases indicate either emerging species or excessive taxonomic splitting based on brightly colored variants. © 2014 Elsevier Inc.

dc.publisherAcademic Press
dc.titleEvolution of pygmy angelfishes: Recent divergences, introgression, and the usefulness of color in taxonomy
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume74
dcterms.source.number1
dcterms.source.startPage38
dcterms.source.endPage47
dcterms.source.issn1055-7903
dcterms.source.titleMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
curtin.departmentDepartment of Environment and Agriculture
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record