How does justice matter in achieving buyer-supplier relationship performance?
MetadataShow full item record
This study presents an analysis exploring how four types of justice (distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational) influence dyadic relationship performance in the buyer-supplier context. Underpinned by loose coupling theory, we build a mediating framework in which we propose that a high level of justice (or fairness) as mutually perceived by both parties drives buyer-supplier relationship performance through bolstered coupling links in mutual knowledge sharing, continuous commitment, and relationship investment. Our survey of 216 paired manufacturers (suppliers) and distributors (buyers) in China generally supports this argument, leading to a conclusion that justice is not a direct determinant of buyer-supplier performance but a critical conduit that nourishes mid-range coupling behaviors, which in turn promotes a successful relationship. Based on findings from this study, firms are encouraged to endorse all four kinds of justice in managing supply chain relationships. However, when constrained by resources, the recommendation for managers is to focus on achieving a high level of perceptual convergence on procedural justice and informational justice with the exchange partner, because mutual perceptions of procedural and informational justice have the strongest effects on coupling behaviors and buyer-supplier relationship performance.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Improving performance and reducing cost in buyer-supplier relationships: The role of justice in curtailing opportunismLuo, Yadong; Liu, Y.; Yang, Q.; Maksimov, V.; Hou, J. (2015)Building on social exchange theory, we study the role of justice perceptions in curtailing opportunism and, in turn, improving performance and reducing governance cost in buyer-supplier relationships. Our analysis of 225 ...
The antecedents and innovation outcomes of firms’ absorptive capacity in global buyer–supplier relationshipsWang, L.; Li, Jun (2016)This article seeks to address two fundamental questions: (1) Does social capital (SC) embedded in global buyer–supplier (GBS) relationships enhance local firms’ potential absorptive capacity (PAC) and realized absorptive ...
Typology and effects of co-opetition in buyer-supplier relationships: Evidence from the chinese home appliance industryLiu, Y.; Luo, Yadong; Yang, P.; Maksimov, V. (2014)Building on the co-opetition perspective, this study takes a unified approach to examine relationship benefits and transaction costs in buyer-supplier relationships. We argue that buyer-supplier vertical dyads fall into ...