Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilschut, J.
dc.contributor.authorHol, L.
dc.contributor.authorDekker, E.
dc.contributor.authorJansen, J.
dc.contributor.authorVan Leerdam, M.
dc.contributor.authorLansdorp_Vogelaar, Iris
dc.contributor.authorKuipers, E.
dc.contributor.authorHabbema, J.
dc.contributor.authorVan Ballegooijen, M.
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-15T22:16:31Z
dc.date.available2017-03-15T22:16:31Z
dc.date.created2017-02-26T19:31:40Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationWilschut, J. and Hol, L. and Dekker, E. and Jansen, J. and Van Leerdam, M. and Lansdorp_Vogelaar, I. and Kuipers, E. et al. 2011. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quantitative immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening. Gastroenterology. 141 (5): pp. 1648-1655.e1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/49861
dc.identifier.doi10.1053/j.gastro.2011.07.020
dc.description.abstract

Background & Aims: Two European randomized trials (N = 30,000) compared guaiac fecal occult blood testing with quantitative fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) and showed better attendance rates and test characteristics for FIT. We aimed to identify the most cost-effective FIT cutoff level for referral to colonoscopy based on data from these trials and allowing for differences in screening ages. Methods: We used the validated MIcrosimulation SCreening ANalysis (MISCAN)-Colon microsimulation model to estimate costs and effects of different screening strategies for FIT cutoff levels of 50, 75, 100, 150, and 200 ng/mL hemoglobin. For each cutoff level, screening strategies were assessed with various age ranges and screening intervals. We assumed sufficient colonoscopy capacity for all strategies. Results: At all cost levels, FIT screening was most effective with the 50 ng/mL cutoff level. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of biennial screening between ages 55 and 75 years using FIT at 50 ng/mL, for example, was 3900 euro per life year gained. Annual screening had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 14,900 euro per life year gained, in combination with a wider age range (between ages 45 and 80 years). In the sensitivity analysis, 50 ng/mL remained the preferred cutoff level. Conclusions: FIT screening is more cost-effective at a cutoff level of 50 ng/mL than at higher cutoff levels. This supports the recommendation to use FIT at a cutoff level of 50 ng/mL, which is considerably lower than the values used in current practice. © 2011 AGA Institute.

dc.publisherW.B. Saunders Co.
dc.titleCost-effectiveness analysis of a quantitative immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume141
dcterms.source.number5
dcterms.source.startPage1648
dcterms.source.endPage1655
dcterms.source.issn0016-5085
dcterms.source.titleGastroenterology
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record