Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSauerwald, S.
dc.contributor.authorPeng, Mike
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-15T22:17:29Z
dc.date.available2017-03-15T22:17:29Z
dc.date.created2017-02-26T19:31:42Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationSauerwald, S. and Peng, M. 2013. Informal institutions, shareholder coalitions, and principal-principal conflicts. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 30 (3): pp. 853-870.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/50135
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10490-012-9312-x
dc.description.abstract

How do informal institutions affect conflicts between controlling and minority shareholders, also known as principal-principal (PP) conflicts? The dominant formal institution-based view of corporate governance suggests that legal rules and regulations are crucial for the protection of shareholder rights. While this perspective has significantly advances our understanding of international corporate governance, we suggest that more attention to informal institutions may complement the formal approach. First, we utilize social identity theory to shed light on the formation of shareholder coalitions. Second, we draw on research involving informal institutions such as culture and trust to better understand PP conflicts. Overall, we extend the growing literature on PP conflicts by an explicit focus on informal institutions.

dc.publisherSpringer New York LLC
dc.titleInformal institutions, shareholder coalitions, and principal-principal conflicts
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume30
dcterms.source.number3
dcterms.source.startPage853
dcterms.source.endPage870
dcterms.source.issn0217-4561
dcterms.source.titleAsia Pacific Journal of Management
curtin.departmentSchool of Management
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record