Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMilton, A.
dc.contributor.authorMullan, Barbara
dc.contributor.authorMacCann, C.
dc.contributor.authorHunt, C.
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-17T08:29:08Z
dc.date.available2017-03-17T08:29:08Z
dc.date.created2017-02-19T19:31:39Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationMilton, A. and Mullan, B. and MacCann, C. and Hunt, C. 2017. An evaluation of communication barriers and facilitators at the time of a mental health diagnosis: a survey of health professional practices. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences. In Press.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/50945
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S2045796016001153
dc.description.abstract

Aims: To examine health professionals’ views and practices relating to the specific barriers to communication that arise at the time of mental health diagnosis, and the strategies used to support individuals throughout this process. Methods: An online survey of the beliefs and practices of 131 mental health clinicians working in different clinical settings across Australia was conducted. Results: Exploratory factor analysis of the items relating to barriers to communication resulted in three latent factors (‘stigma, diagnosis and risk’; ‘service structure’; and ‘individual circumstances’ such as the person receiving the diagnosis being young, having a culturally and linguistically diverse background or being unwell at the time of conversation). Using linear regression it was found that variance in ‘stigma, diagnosis and risk’ was significantly explained by whether participating clinicians had medical training, their experience working with serious mental health problems, their confidence handling distress and attitude towards diagnosis. Variance in ‘individual circumstances’ was significantly explained by participating clinicians’ confidence handling distress. The most frequently used strategies to support diagnostic discussions centred on the health professionals’ communication skills, gauging the individual's perception of their circumstances, responding with empathy, following-up after discussion, addressing stigma concerns, using collaborative practice and setting up for the conversation. Conclusions: Three main areas for health professionals to reflect on, plan for and ultimately address when discussing news with the individual concerned emerged (‘stigma, diagnosis and risk’; ‘service structure’; and ‘individual circumstances’). Variations in practice indicate that practitioners should be cognisant of their own beliefs and background and how this impacts their communication practice.

dc.titleAn evaluation of communication barriers and facilitators at the time of a mental health diagnosis: a survey of health professional practices
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.startPage1
dcterms.source.endPage12
dcterms.source.issn2045-7960
dcterms.source.titleEpidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
curtin.departmentSchool of Psychology and Speech Pathology
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record