Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVolgger, Michael
dc.contributor.authorPechlaner, H.
dc.contributor.authorPichler, S.
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-04T02:46:35Z
dc.date.available2017-04-04T02:46:35Z
dc.date.created2017-04-03T10:56:21Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationVolgger, M. and Pechlaner, H. and Pichler, S. 2017. The practice of destination governance: A comparative analysis of key dimensions and underlying concepts. Journal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing. 3 (1): pp. 18-24.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/51818
dc.identifier.doi10.5281/zenodo.401371
dc.description.abstract

Most of research on destination governance focuses on reporting the results of single case studies, whose findings are often related to the particularities of the specific destinations considered. As a result, there is little (empirical) consistency in underlying principles and dimensions of destination governance. To overcome this gap, this paper presents a combined (re-)analysis of multiple qualitative case studies and empirically develops destination governance dimensions from a practitioner point of view. Findings show that theoretical conceptualisation of destination governance and practical foci differ in some respects: In contrast to governance theory, practitioners refer more to context, process and change.

dc.titleThe practice of destination governance: A comparative analysis of key dimensions and underlying concepts
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume3
dcterms.source.number1
dcterms.source.startPage18
dcterms.source.endPage24
dcterms.source.issn2529-1947
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing
curtin.departmentSchool of Marketing
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record