Clinically acceptable agreement between the ViMove wireless motion sensor system and the Vicon motion capture system when measuring lumbar motion in flexion/extension and lateral flexion
dc.contributor.author | Mjøsund, H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Boyle, E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kjær, P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mieritz, R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Skallgård, T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kent, Peter | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-28T13:57:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-04-28T13:57:27Z | |
dc.date.created | 2017-04-28T09:06:17Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Mjøsund, H. and Boyle, E. and Kjær, P. and Mieritz, R. and Skallgård, T. and Kent, P. 2017. Clinically acceptable agreement between the ViMove wireless motion sensor system and the Vicon motion capture system when measuring lumbar motion in flexion/extension and lateral flexion. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 18: 124. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/52081 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s12891-017-1489-1 | |
dc.description.abstract |
Background Wireless, wearable, inertial motion sensor technology introduces new possibilities for monitoring spinal motion and pain in people during their daily activities of work, rest and play. There are many types of these wireless devices currently available but the precision in measurement and the magnitude of measurement error from such devices is often unknown. This study investigated the concurrent validity of one inertial motion sensor system (ViMove) for its ability to measure lumbar inclination motion, compared with the Vicon motion capture system. Methods To mimic the variability of movement patterns in a clinical population, a sample of 34 people were included – 18 with low back pain and 16 without low back pain. ViMove sensors were attached to each participant’s skin at spinal levels T12 and S2, and Vicon surface markers were attached to the ViMove sensors. Three repetitions of end-range flexion inclination, extension inclination and lateral flexion inclination to both sides while standing were measured by both systems concurrently with short rest periods in between. Measurement agreement through the whole movement range was analysed using a multilevel mixed-effects regression model to calculate the root mean squared errors and the limits of agreement were calculated using the Bland Altman method. Results We calculated root mean squared errors (standard deviation) of 1.82° (±1.00°) in flexion inclination, 0.71° (±0.34°) in extension inclination, 0.77° (±0.24°) in right lateral flexion inclination and 0.98° (±0.69°) in left lateral flexion inclination. 95% limits of agreement ranged between -3.86° and 4.69° in flexion inclination, -2.15° and 1.91° in extension inclination, -2.37° and 2.05° in right lateral flexion inclination and -3.11° and 2.96° in left lateral flexion inclination. Conclusions We found a clinically acceptable level of agreement between these two methods for measuring standing lumbar inclination motion in these two cardinal movement planes. Further research should investigate the ViMove system’s ability to measure lumbar motion in more complex 3D functional movements and to measure changes of movement patterns related to treatment effects. | |
dc.publisher | Biomed Central Ltd | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.title | Clinically acceptable agreement between the ViMove wireless motion sensor system and the Vicon motion capture system when measuring lumbar motion in flexion/extension and lateral flexion | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.volume | 18 | |
dcterms.source.number | 124 | |
dcterms.source.startPage | 1 | |
dcterms.source.endPage | 9 | |
dcterms.source.title | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | |
curtin.department | School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science | |
curtin.accessStatus | Open access |