Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUng, K.
dc.contributor.authorBona, Andrej
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-28T13:59:50Z
dc.date.available2017-04-28T13:59:50Z
dc.date.created2017-04-28T09:06:07Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationUng, K. and Bona, A. 2016. Comparison on finite-difference and common focusing point redatuming technique for hard rock seismic, in Near Surface Geoscience 2016 - First Conference on Geophysics for Mineral Exploration and Mining, Sept 4-8 2016, Barcelona, Spain: EAGE.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/52751
dc.description.abstract

As mineral deposits are bounded to hard rock environment, seismic method suffers from near surface complex wave propagation effect. We applied and compared two wave extrapolation redatuming techniques, namely finite-difference and common focus point, methods with the aim to improve imaging by removing propagation footprints form near surface. Redatuming method relocates the sources and receivers from the surface to any datum in the subsurface while removing any propagation effect between the new datum and the surface. This study uses synthetic data obtained from a velocity model with rough undulating shallow boundary to introduce complex propagation effects. Under certain conditions, the common focus point method can be used instead of finite-difference method to decrease computational time. Both method produce an accurate imaging of the target reflector however the finite-difference method does produce more synthetic noise.

dc.titleComparison on finite-difference and common focusing point redatuming technique for hard rock seismic
dc.typeConference Paper
dcterms.source.titleNear Surface Geoscience 2016 - First Conference on Geophysics for Mineral Exploration and Mining
curtin.departmentDepartment of Exploration Geophysics
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record