Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilkins, Peter
dc.contributor.authorPhillimore, John
dc.contributor.authorGilchrist, David
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-28T13:59:53Z
dc.date.available2017-04-28T13:59:53Z
dc.date.created2017-04-28T09:06:16Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationWilkins, P. and Phillimore, J. and Gilchrist, D. 2017. Benefits and risks of collaboration between watchdogs: the Western Australian experience. Policy Studies. 38 (4): pp. 291-310.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/52776
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01442872.2017.1301414
dc.description.abstract

There has been little discussion or analysis regarding how integrity agencies work together. This paper looks at Western Australian watchdog collaboration activities in the context of concerns raised by senior judicial and political figures. Issues addressed include whether such collaborative activities impinge on the independence of watchdogs, impede their ability to oversight each other, and whether such activities take them beyond their legislative remit. Analysis of practice revealed a wide array of collaboration activities of varying intensity. It was found that such collaboration enhanced watchdog effectiveness while the concerns expressed appeared over-stated. The analysis identified precautions required to protect watchdog independence and ensure accountability for collaborative activities, including steps to recognize and remove barriers to greater collaboration.

dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.titleBenefits and risks of collaboration between watchdogs: the Western Australian experience
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volumeOnline
dcterms.source.issn0144-2872
dcterms.source.titlePolicy Studies
curtin.departmentJohn Curtin Institute of Public Policy (JCIPP)
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record