Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaskerville, Richard
dc.contributor.authorLyytinen, K.
dc.contributor.authorSambamurthy, V.
dc.contributor.authorStraub, D.
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-23T02:58:39Z
dc.date.available2017-06-23T02:58:39Z
dc.date.created2017-06-19T03:39:26Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationBaskerville, R. and Lyytinen, K. and Sambamurthy, V. and Straub, D. 2011. A response to the design-oriented information systems research memorandum. European Journal of Information Systems. 20 (1): pp. 11-15.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/53115
dc.identifier.doi10.1057/ejis.2010.56
dc.description.abstract

In response to Österle et al.'s' Memorandum on Design Oriented Information Systems Research', this commentary disputes, and expands the context of, several premises used to justify the main argument in the memorandum. These include: (1) claims about the evolution and role of design science research in the broader IS community and its position in the so-called 'Anglo-Saxon community', (2) the journal reviewing standards applied to design science research and what is perceived to be a sole focus on behavioral 'descriptive' research in certain IS journals. This commentary also discusses how such journals operate and set up their missions, review principles, and standards.

dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillan Ltd.
dc.titleA response to the design-oriented information systems research memorandum
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume20
dcterms.source.number1
dcterms.source.startPage11
dcterms.source.endPage15
dcterms.source.issn0960-085X
dcterms.source.titleEuropean Journal of Information Systems
curtin.departmentSchool of Information Systems
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record