Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlison, J.
dc.contributor.authorMcKeough, Z.
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, K.
dc.contributor.authorMcNamara, R.
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, L.
dc.contributor.authorJenkins, Susan
dc.contributor.authorHill, C.
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, V.
dc.contributor.authorFrith, P.
dc.contributor.authorCafarella, P.
dc.contributor.authorBrooke, M.
dc.contributor.authorCameron-Tucker, H.
dc.contributor.authorCandy, S.
dc.contributor.authorCecins, N.
dc.contributor.authorChan, A.
dc.contributor.authorDale, M.
dc.contributor.authorDowman, L.
dc.contributor.authorGranger, C.
dc.contributor.authorHalloran, S.
dc.contributor.authorJung, P.
dc.contributor.authorLee, A.
dc.contributor.authorLeung, R.
dc.contributor.authorMatulick, T.
dc.contributor.authorOsadnik, C.
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, M.
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, J.
dc.contributor.authorWootton, S.
dc.contributor.authorHolland, A.
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-23T02:59:05Z
dc.date.available2017-06-23T02:59:05Z
dc.date.created2017-06-19T03:39:29Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationAlison, J. and McKeough, Z. and Johnston, K. and McNamara, R. and Spencer, L. and Jenkins, S. and Hill, C. et al. 2017. Australian and New Zealand Pulmonary Rehabilitation Guidelines. Respirology. 22 (4): pp. 800-819.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/53220
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/resp.13025
dc.description.abstract

Background and objective: The aim of the Pulmonary Rehabilitation Guidelines (Guidelines) is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the practice of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) specific to Australian and New Zealand healthcare contexts. Methods: The Guideline methodology adhered to the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II criteria. Nine key questions were constructed in accordance with the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) format and reviewed by a COPD consumer group for appropriateness. Systematic reviews were undertaken for each question and recommendations made with the strength of each recommendation based on the GRADE (Gradings of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria. The Guidelines were externally reviewed by a panel of experts. Results: The Guideline panel recommended that patients with mild-to-severe COPD should undergo PR to improve quality of life and exercise capacity and to reduce hospital admissions; that PR could be offered in hospital gyms, community centres or at home and could be provided irrespective of the availability of a structured education programme; that PR should be offered to patients with bronchiectasis, interstitial lung disease and pulmonary hypertension, with the latter in specialized centres. The Guideline panel was unable to make recommendations relating to PR programme length beyond 8 weeks, the optimal model for maintenance after PR, or the use of supplemental oxygen during exercise training. The strength of each recommendation and the quality of the evidence are presented in the summary. Conclusion: The Australian and New Zealand Pulmonary Rehabilitation Guidelines present an evaluation of the evidence for nine PICO questions, with recommendations to provide guidance for clinicians and policymakers.

dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Asia
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.titleAustralian and New Zealand Pulmonary Rehabilitation Guidelines
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume22
dcterms.source.number4
dcterms.source.startPage800
dcterms.source.endPage819
dcterms.source.issn1323-7799
dcterms.source.titleRespirology
curtin.departmentSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/