Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCherpitel, C.
dc.contributor.authorYe, Y.
dc.contributor.authorStockwell, Tim
dc.contributor.authorVallance, K.
dc.contributor.authorChow, C.
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-23T02:59:32Z
dc.date.available2017-06-23T02:59:32Z
dc.date.created2017-06-19T03:39:39Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationCherpitel, C. and Ye, Y. and Stockwell, T. and Vallance, K. and Chow, C. 2018. Recall bias across 7 days in self-reported alcohol consumption prior to injury among emergency department patients. Drug and Alcohol Review. 37 (3): pp. 382-388.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/53336
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/dar.12558
dc.description.abstract

Introduction and Aims: Recall bias is a concern in self-reported alcohol consumption, potentially accounting for varying risk estimates for injury in emergency department (ED) studies. The likelihood of reporting drinking for the same 6-h period each day of the week for a full week preceding the injury event is analysed among injured ED patients. Design and Methods: Probability samples of patients 18 years old and older were interviewed in two ED sites in Vancouver and one in Victoria, BC (n = 1191). Generalized estimating equation modelling was used to predict the likelihood of reporting drinking for the same 6-h period prior to the injury event for each day of the week, compared to day 7 as the reference recall day, for a full week preceding the event. Recall by frequency of drinking and frequency of heavy drinking was analysed. Results: Drinking was significantly more likely to be reported for each of the first 3 days of recall compared to 7-day recall and highest for 1-day recall (odds ration 1.55; = 0.002). Patients who reported = weekly drinking and 5+ drinking < monthly were significantly more likely to report drinking for each of the first 3 days of recall (compared to 7-day recall). Discussion: Findings suggest the first 3 days prior to injury may be a less biased multiple-matched control period than longer periods of recall in case-crossover studies. Conclusion: Length of accurate recall may be important to consider in case-crossover analysis and other study designs that rely on patient self-report such as the Timeline Followback. [Cherpitel CJ, Ye Y, Stockwell T, Vallance K, Chow C. Recall bias across 7 days in self-reported alcohol consumption prior to injury among emergency department patients. Drug Alcohol Rev 2017;00:000-000]

dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
dc.titleRecall bias across 7 days in self-reported alcohol consumption prior to injury among emergency department patients
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.issn0959-5236
dcterms.source.titleDrug and Alcohol Review
curtin.departmentNational Drug Research Institute (NDRI)
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record