Designing urban spaces for sustainable behaviour: Shaping communities and social conditions through surveillance—a paradox of public protection at the expense of personal privacy
MetadataShow full item record
French philosopher Michel Foucault described the panopticon as “a figure of political technology that must be detached from any specific use.” His depiction of panoptic spaces as intolerable and intimidating—however persuasive his sentiment—is arguably outdated as global populations have increased and shifts in technology, urbanization, and human communication and integration have occurred at unprecedented rates. What is true is that panoptic spaces can be used as surreptitious instruments of examination, facilitating the omnipotent observer, but it is not the panoptic space that is evil, rather arguably the intent of an observer without conscience and a perverse mind that allows for it to occur. Electronic surveillance systems used in strategic architectural spaces are powerful instruments of observation positioned with the intent that they detect, prevent, and capture evidence of crime. Increasingly, however, surveillance appears to have little correlation to crime statistics, violence, or behavioural self-modification. This suggests that people in modern urban spaces have become desensitised to the constant observation that occurs in environments that are saturated with surveillance technology in much the same way as the over-use of signage in big cities over-stimulates the senses and becomes indistinct and redundant. Similarly, the overuse of overt surveillance makes the concept of behavioural selfmodification fundamentally flawed, and, as such, these systems do little to support sustainable social behaviours that promote active and safe communities when our awareness of surveillance in the urban environment is diminished. This paper examines international examples of urban surveillance and argues that electronic surveillance technologies without a physical and respected authoritarian presence do not dissuade unwanted behaviours. Further, fear-mongering is designed to persuade society that increased surveillance is in the public interest to prevent crime. This paper suggests that the link that supports sustainable social behaviours and social engagement in urban contexts is well-considered design of urban spaces that specifically promote active communities. Many urban spaces, however, consider the placement and integration of surveillance devices as essential, and, where given prominence, this paper will provide commentary on such settings and circumstances where their existence becomes little more than staged environments designed to invade civil liberties and individual privacy.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Using smartphones to navigate urban spaces: People with disabilities and the role of mobile technologies in three WA locationsKent, Michael; Ellis, Katie; Locke, Kathryn; Hollier, Scott; Denney, A. (2017)People with disabilities report a number of consistently disabling access issues while moving through urban environments. These can result in social isolation and cause people with disability to avoid going to new or hard ...
The role of economic development and urban planning in the development of knowledge-based regions in secondary economic centres : a comparative study of Australia and JapanMartinus, Kirsten R. (2011)Knowledge development and innovation have frequently been linked to rapid sustainable economic growth. Recent unprecedented globalisation and technological advancements have made understanding this relationship more ...
Saili, Abdul Rahman (2011)Farmers‟ markets are an exciting and important form of free enterprise. They have a strong potential to support sustainable development due to the myriad of economic and social benefits they could bring to a society. ...