Judicial Activism gives recognition to a general class action in South Africa
dc.contributor.author | De Vos, Wouter | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-06-23T03:01:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-06-23T03:01:01Z | |
dc.date.created | 2017-06-19T03:39:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.citation | De Vos, W. 2013. Judicial Activism gives recognition to a general class action in South Africa. Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg / Journal of South African Law. 2013 (2): pp. 370-380. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/53709 | |
dc.description.abstract |
After decades of debates on the viability of class actions in South Africa the supreme court of appeal has finally given recognition to a general class action for damages. There is clear authority, preceding the judgment under discussion, that section 38(c) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, provides a sufficient basis for the institution of a class action to enforce any constitutional right. The lack of legislation regulating these complicated proceedings has, therefore, not been viewed as an impediment to the prosecution of a large number of such similar claims in this manner. This has happened in the respective judgments of Froneman J, in Ngxuza v Permanent Secretary, Department of Welfare, Eastern Cape (2001 2 SA 609 (E)) and Cameron JA, in Permanent Secretary, Department of Welfare, Eastern Cape v Ngxuza (2001 4 SA 1184 (SCA)). | |
dc.publisher | Juta & Company Ltd. * Juta Law | |
dc.title | Judicial Activism gives recognition to a general class action in South Africa | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.number | 2 | |
dcterms.source.startPage | 370 | |
dcterms.source.endPage | 380 | |
dcterms.source.issn | 0257-7747 | |
dcterms.source.title | Journal of South African Law | |
curtin.department | Curtin Law School | |
curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available |
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |