Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDe Vos, Wouter
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-23T03:01:01Z
dc.date.available2017-06-23T03:01:01Z
dc.date.created2017-06-19T03:39:37Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationDe Vos, W. 2013. Judicial Activism gives recognition to a general class action in South Africa. Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg / Journal of South African Law. 2013 (2): pp. 370-380.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/53709
dc.description.abstract

After decades of debates on the viability of class actions in South Africa the supreme court of appeal has finally given recognition to a general class action for damages. There is clear authority, preceding the judgment under discussion, that section 38(c) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, provides a sufficient basis for the institution of a class action to enforce any constitutional right. The lack of legislation regulating these complicated proceedings has, therefore, not been viewed as an impediment to the prosecution of a large number of such similar claims in this manner. This has happened in the respective judgments of Froneman J, in Ngxuza v Permanent Secretary, Department of Welfare, Eastern Cape (2001 2 SA 609 (E)) and Cameron JA, in Permanent Secretary, Department of Welfare, Eastern Cape v Ngxuza (2001 4 SA 1184 (SCA)).

dc.publisherJuta & Company Ltd. * Juta Law
dc.titleJudicial Activism gives recognition to a general class action in South Africa
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.number2
dcterms.source.startPage370
dcterms.source.endPage380
dcterms.source.issn0257-7747
dcterms.source.titleJournal of South African Law
curtin.departmentCurtin Law School
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record