Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWoodside, Arch
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-23T03:01:23Z
dc.date.available2017-06-23T03:01:23Z
dc.date.created2017-06-19T03:39:42Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationWoodside, A. 2015. Visualizing⋅matching⋅generalizing: Case identification hypotheses and case-level data analysis. Australasian Marketing Journal. 23 (3): pp. 246-258.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/53771
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ausmj.2015.07.002
dc.description.abstract

The traditional and still dominant logic among nearly all empirical positivist researchers in schools of management is to write symmetric (two-directional) variable hypotheses (SVH) even though the same researchers formulate their behavioral theories at the case (typology) identification level. The behavioral theory of the firm, theories of buyer behavior, and Miles and Snow's typology of organization's strategy configurations (e.g., "prospectors, analyzers, and defenders") are iconic examples of formulating theory at the case identification level. When testing such theories, most researchers automatically, unconsciously, switch from building theory of beliefs, attitudes, and behavior at the case identification level to empirically testing of two-directional relationships and additive net-effect influences of variables. Formulating theory focusing on creating case identification hypotheses (CIH) to describe, explain, and predict behavior and then empirically testing at SVH is a mismatch and results in shallow data analysis and frequently inaccurate contributions to theory. This paper describes the mismatch and resulting unattractive outcomes as well as the pervasive practice of examining only fit validity in empirical studies using symmetric tests. The paper reviews studies in the literature showing how matching both case-based theory and empirical positivist research of CIH is possible and produces findings that advance useful theory and critical thinking by executives and researchers.

dc.publisherElsevier
dc.titleVisualizing⋅matching⋅generalizing: Case identification hypotheses and case-level data analysis
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume23
dcterms.source.number3
dcterms.source.startPage246
dcterms.source.endPage258
dcterms.source.issn1441-3582
dcterms.source.titleAustralasian Marketing Journal
curtin.departmentSchool of Marketing
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record