Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSheppard, S.
dc.contributor.authorRasmussen, B.
dc.contributor.authorZi, J.
dc.contributor.authorSomasekhar, V.
dc.contributor.authorSrinivasa Sarma, D.
dc.contributor.authorRam Mohan, M.
dc.contributor.authorKrapež, B.
dc.contributor.authorWilde, S.
dc.contributor.authorMcNaughton, Neal
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-23T03:03:03Z
dc.date.available2017-06-23T03:03:03Z
dc.date.created2017-06-23T02:46:05Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationSheppard, S. and Rasmussen, B. and Zi, J. and Somasekhar, V. and Srinivasa Sarma, D. and Ram Mohan, M. and Krapež, B. et al. 2017. Sedimentation and magmatism in the Paleoproterozoic Cuddapah Basin, India: Consequences of lithospheric extension. Gondwana Research. 48: pp. 153-163.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/54013
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gr.2017.04.024
dc.description.abstract

The Cuddapah Basin is one of many Proterozoic, intracontinental sedimentary basins across Peninsular India. The basin comprises several unconformity-bounded successions, the lowermost of which (the Papaghni Group and overlying Chitravati Group) are intruded by dolerite sills that contact metamorphosed their host rocks. A mafic-ultramafic sill from the base of the Tadpatri Formation in the Chitravati Group was previously dated at c. 1885 Ma, and interpreted to be part of a large igneous province (LIP). We have dated two samples of a felsic tuff from the upper part of the Tadpatri Formation at 1864 ± 13 Ma and 1858 ± 16 Ma; combining data from the two samples yields a weighted mean date of 1862 ± 9 Ma. Mafic sills intrude rocks stratigraphically above the tuffaceous beds, indicating that mafic magmatism continued until after c. 1860 Ma. Given that the sills intruded lithified rocks, some of the sills may be considerably younger than 1860 Ma. Mafic volcanic rocks are also known from below the unconformity at the base of the Chitravati Group, within the basal Papaghni Group (> c. 1890 Ma). Collectively, these data indicate that mafic sill emplacement spanned more than 30 myr so that it is likely to have been a protracted event or a series of events, and, therefore unlikely to represent a LIP. The time span for mafic magmatism is more compatible with episodic, lithospheric extension (passive rifting) during basin evolution than it is with a mantle plume (active rifting).

dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.titleSedimentation and magmatism in the Paleoproterozoic Cuddapah Basin, India: Consequences of lithospheric extension
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume48
dcterms.source.startPage153
dcterms.source.endPage163
dcterms.source.issn1342-937X
dcterms.source.titleGondwana Research
curtin.departmentJohn de Laeter Centre
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record