Curtin University Homepage
  • Library
  • Help
    • Admin

    espace - Curtin’s institutional repository

    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item
    • espace Home
    • espace
    • Curtin Research Publications
    • View Item

    Key Measurement and Feasibility Characteristics When Selecting Outcome Measures

    Access Status
    Fulltext not available
    Authors
    Harrold, Megan
    Elliott, D.
    Berney, S.
    Skinner, E.
    Date
    2015
    Type
    Journal Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Harrold, M. and Elliott, D. and Berney, S. and Skinner, E. 2015. Key Measurement and Feasibility Characteristics When Selecting Outcome Measures. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports. 3 (4): pp. 255-267.
    Source Title
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports
    DOI
    10.1007/s40141-015-0099-9
    School
    School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/54334
    Collection
    • Curtin Research Publications
    Abstract

    Selection of appropriate outcome measures to assess progress in physical rehabilitation across the complete recovery continuum is essential but may pose challenges in clinical practice. This paper examines key measurement and feasibility characteristics for outcome measures, using critical care survivors as an exemplar. With increased survivorship following a critical illness, initiatives to improve the recovery trajectory for patients have become a focus for clinicians and researchers. For this patient cohort, we present a 3-tier framework and use of standing and non-standing patient phenotypes to guide instrument selection. Key measurement issues for clinicians to consider include the responsiveness, criterion validity, and reliability of functional assessment instruments. Patient-centered factors that may influence performance and the effectiveness of assessments include frailty, fatigue, and other varied symptoms of patient discomfort. Suggestions to address these challenges are discussed, specifically prioritizing outcome measurement according to tier, consideration of patient and ICU-related factors, and recommendations to standardize outcome measurement to a core set.

    Related items

    Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

    • An integrated approach to outcome evaluation : incorporating patient reported outcomes in heart failure
      Chang, Sungwon (2012)
      Globally individuals and health care systems are facing the burden of chronic illness. The impact of the increasing burden of non-communicable diseases is experienced by individuals and health care systems. Across the ...
    • The role of functional, radiological and self-reported measures in predicting clinical outcome in spondylotic cervical radiculopathy
      Agarwal, Shabnam (2011)
      BackgroundCervical radiculopathy (CR) results in significant disability and pain and is commonly treated conservatively with satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, a considerable number of patients require surgery to ...
    • Development of a percutaneous coronary intervention patient level composite measure for a clinical quality registry
      Ayton, D.; Soh, S.E.; Morello, R.; Ahern, S.; Earnest, A.; Brennan, A.; Lefkovits, J.; Evans, S.; Reid, Christopher ; Ruseckaite, R.; McNeil, J. (2020)
      © 2020 The Author(s). Background: Composite measures combine data to provide a comprehensive view of patient outcomes. Despite composite measures being a valuable tool to assess post-intervention outcomes, the patient ...
    Advanced search

    Browse

    Communities & CollectionsIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument TypeThis CollectionIssue DateAuthorTitleSubjectDocument Type

    My Account

    Admin

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Follow Curtin

    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 

    CRICOS Provider Code: 00301JABN: 99 143 842 569TEQSA: PRV12158

    Copyright | Disclaimer | Privacy statement | Accessibility

    Curtin would like to pay respect to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander members of our community by acknowledging the traditional owners of the land on which the Perth campus is located, the Whadjuk people of the Nyungar Nation; and on our Kalgoorlie campus, the Wongutha people of the North-Eastern Goldfields.