Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAl-Yahyaee, K.
dc.contributor.authorAl-Hadi, Ahmed
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-27T05:21:21Z
dc.date.available2017-07-27T05:21:21Z
dc.date.created2017-07-26T11:11:29Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationAl-Yahyaee, K. and Al-Hadi, A. 2016. Ineffective corporate governance: Busyness of internal board monitoring committees. Corporate Ownership & Control. 13 (3-2): pp. 309-325.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/54525
dc.identifier.doi10.22495/cocv13i3c2p5
dc.description.abstract

We examine whether the voluntary formation of a Risk Committee (RC) compromises the effectiveness of other monitoring duties carried out by the board members. We argue that adding more monitoring committees increases the board’s internal busyness, which reduces the effectiveness of monitoring by the Audit Committee (AC). Using a sample of financial firms over the period 2007 to 2011 from the Gulf Cooperation Countries (GCC), we find that voluntarily adopting a risk committee impairs the effectiveness of the audit committee, which in turn reduces financial reporting quality. Our findings suggest that multiple layers of monitoring capacity viz-a-viz the existence of both an audit and risk committee may weaken the quality of monitoring provided by the audit committee.

dc.publisherVirtus interpress
dc.titleIneffective corporate governance: Busyness of internal board monitoring committees
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume13
dcterms.source.number3-2
dcterms.source.startPage309
dcterms.source.endPage325
dcterms.source.issn1727-9232
dcterms.source.titleCorporate control and ownership
curtin.departmentSchool of Accounting
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record