Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) - Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome
MetadataShow full item record
Background: The prominence of sedentary behavior research in health science has grown rapidly. With this growth there is increasing urgency for clear, common and accepted terminology and definitions. Such standardization is difficult to achieve, especially across multi-disciplinary researchers, practitioners, and industries. The Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) undertook a Terminology Consensus Project to address this need. Method: First, a literature review was completed to identify key terms in sedentary behavior research. These key terms were then reviewed and modified by a Steering Committee formed by SBRN. Next, SBRN members were invited to contribute to this project and interested participants reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed list of terms and draft definitions through an online survey. Finally, a conceptual model and consensus definitions (including caveats and examples for all age groups and functional abilities) were finalized based on the feedback received from the 87 SBRN member participants who responded to the original invitation and survey. Results: Consensus definitions for the terms physical inactivity, stationary behavior, sedentary behavior, standing, screen time, non-screen-based sedentary time, sitting, reclining, lying, sedentary behavior pattern, as well as how the terms bouts, breaks, and interruptions should be used in this context are provided. Conclusion: It is hoped that the definitions resulting from this comprehensive, transparent, and broad-based participatory process will result in standardized terminology that is widely supported and adopted, thereby advancing future research, interventions, policies, and practices related to sedentary behaviors.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Holtermann, A.; Schellewald, V.; Mathiassen, Svend; Gupta, N.; Pinder, A.; Punakallio, A.; Veiersted, K.; Weber, B.; Takala, E.; Draicchio, F.; Enquist, H.; Desbrosses, K.; García Sanz, M.; Malinska, M.; Villar, M.; Wichtl, M.; Strebl, M.; Forsman, M.; Lusa, S.; Tokarski, T.; Hendriksen, P.; Ellegast, R. (2017)© 2017 Elsevier Ltd Sedentary behavior is defined as sitting or lying with low energy expenditure. Humans in industrialized societies spend an increasing amount of time in sedentary behaviors every day. This has been ...
The SOS-framework (Systems of Sedentary behaviours): An international transdisciplinary consensus framework for the study of determinants, research priorities and policy on sedentary behaviour across the life course: A DEDIPAC-studyChastin, S.; De Craemer, M.; Lien, N.; Bernaards, C.; Buck, C.; Oppert, J.; Nazare, J.; Lakerveld, J.; O'Donoghue, G.; Holdsworth, M.; Owen, N.; Brug, J.; Cardon, G.; Conroy, D.; Healy, Genevieve; Langøien, L.; Reilly, J.; Rutter, H.; Salmon, J.; Skelton, D.; Abula, K.; Ahrens, W.; Alshayji, I.; Arrogi, A.; Arundell, L.; Filho, V.; Brondeel, R.; Bullock, V.; Burns, J.; Busschaert, C.; Capranica, L.; Chastin, S.; Condello, G.; Crist, K.; Dall, P.; De Cocker, K.; De Lepeleere, S.; Dontje, M.; Duvivier, B.; Edelson, L.; Fenton, S.; Fisher, K.; Fletcher, E.; Freiberger, E.; Hadgraft, N.; Harvey, J.; Hawari, N.; Hayee, M.; Hayes, C.; Hinkley, T.; Huang, W.; Kilpatrick, M.; Kirk, A.; Koorts, H.; Leask, C.; Lee, J.; Loyen, A.; Määttä, S.; Mair, J.; McMicha, L.; Mellis, M.; Nicolaou, M.; O'Dolan, C.; Olander, E.; Orme, M.; Perchoux, C.; Pulsford, R.; Rebar, A.; Routen, A.; Rutten, G.; Sanderson, P.; Savelberg, H.; Schmitz, C.; Shaw, R.; Sherar, L.; Da Silva, K.; Sudholz, B.; Timperio, A.; van Lieshout, R.; Whelan, M.; Wong, S. (2016)© 2016 The Author(s). Background: Ecological models are currently the most used approaches to classify and conceptualise determinants of sedentary behaviour, but these approaches are limited in their ability to capture ...
Ling, B.; Ho, C.; Wang, L.; Teo, Kok Lay; Tse, C.k; Dai, Q. (2014)Some of the nodes of complex social networks may support for a given proposal, while the rest of the nodes may be against the given proposal. Even though all the nodes support for or are against the given proposal, the ...