Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHawthorne, G.
dc.contributor.authorDe Morton, N.
dc.contributor.authorKent, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-27T05:22:42Z
dc.date.available2017-07-27T05:22:42Z
dc.date.created2017-07-26T11:11:30Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationHawthorne, G. and De Morton, N. and Kent, P. 2013. Back pain and social isolation: Cross-sectional validation of the friendship scale for use in studies on low back pain. Clinical Journal of Pain. 29 (3): pp. 245-252.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/54936
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/AJP.0b013e31824b3aed
dc.description.abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is common, and social isolation is both a risk factor for poor recovery and a consequence. However, no studies seem to have validated social isolation measures in LBP populations. Aims: This study assessed the validity of the Friendship Scale (FS), a brief measure of social isolation. Methods: LBP participants were 100 consecutive consenting adult patients attending physiotherapy outpatient clinics, matched (1:2) by age and gender with a general population sample (GPS; n=200). FS validation was through factor analysis, internal consistency, sensitivity by known groups, and Rasch analysis. Results: There were significant differences between LPB and GPS on 5 of the 6 FS items. Social isolation on the FS was reported by 26% of the LBP cohort compared with 9% of the GPS. All FS items loaded on the principal component < 0.60, suggesting unidimensionality. Internal consistency was α=0.81. The FS was sensitive by pain severity and study cohort. Rasch analysis showed no disordered items, although 2 items were marginally misfitting. Differential item functioning by sex was observed on 1 item; there was no other observed differential item functioning. After removal of the worst fitting item (feeling alone), the remaining items fit the Rasch model. This, however, may have been a function of study samples. Conclusions: Generally, the FS performed well, and its descriptive system contains excess capacity beyond that needed in the study population; that is, those with LBP were not particularly socially isolated, and responses indicating severe social isolation were barely reported by these participants. Overall, the FS appears to be a suitable instrument for assessing social isolation among LBP patients.

dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.titleBack pain and social isolation: Cross-sectional validation of the friendship scale for use in studies on low back pain
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume29
dcterms.source.number3
dcterms.source.startPage245
dcterms.source.endPage252
dcterms.source.issn0749-8047
dcterms.source.titleClinical Journal of Pain
curtin.departmentSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record