Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFarrugia, A.
dc.contributor.authorFraser, Suzanne
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-27T05:23:00Z
dc.date.available2017-07-27T05:23:00Z
dc.date.created2017-07-26T11:11:11Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationFarrugia, A. and Fraser, S. 2017. Young brains at risk: Co-constituting youth and addiction in neuroscience-informed Australian drug education. BioSocieties. 12 (4): pp. 588–610.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/55022
dc.identifier.doi10.1057/s41292-017-0047-2
dc.description.abstract

This article explores the developing relationship between neuroscientific understandings of ‘addiction’ and ‘youth’. Drawing on science and technology studies theory and social scientific analyses of both these concepts, it identifies a co-constitutive relationship between notions of addiction as a brain disease and of youth as a stage of brain development. These two concepts are then tracked in a series of drug education documents concerned with alcohol and other drug (AOD) use and addiction among young people, and their implications and effects and analysed together. The aim is to investigate the impact on drug education of neuroscientific approaches to youth and addiction. Are new concepts and directions for harm reduction created in the encounters between neuroscience, youth and addiction, or do they simply reinstate and reinforce existing assumptions and judgments? Is drug education shaped by these concepts likely to achieve its aim, that is, to increase young people’s sensitivity to harm and safety? The article begins by introducing neuroscientific accounts of youth and addiction, arguing that the two concepts share three key assumptions. First, both emphasise biology and sideline social context in the making of drug use practices and outcomes. Second, both reproduce uncritical treatments of brain scans (PET and fMRI images) as windows into minds and subjects. Third, both understand the brain as ontologically separate from its environment. These assumptions and their implications are then tracked through an analysis of Australian drug education resources, focusing on how drug education constitutes youthfulness and addiction as pathological disorders. In its reliance on neuroscientific understandings of youth and addiction, we conclude, drug education is unlikely to achieve its goal of reducing drug-related harm.

dc.titleYoung brains at risk: Co-constituting youth and addiction in neuroscience-informed Australian drug education
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.startPage1
dcterms.source.endPage23
dcterms.source.issn1745-8552
dcterms.source.titleBioSocieties
curtin.departmentNational Drug Research Institute (NDRI)
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record