Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWu, Q.
dc.contributor.authorSpiryagin, M.
dc.contributor.authorWolfs, Peter
dc.contributor.authorSun, Y.
dc.contributor.authorCole, C.
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-24T02:19:27Z
dc.date.available2017-08-24T02:19:27Z
dc.date.created2017-08-23T07:21:40Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationWu, Q. and Spiryagin, M. and Wolfs, P. and Sun, Y. and Cole, C. 2017. Simulated comparison of energy storage systems for heavy haul locomotives.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/55619
dc.identifier.doi10.1115/JRC2017-2217
dc.description.abstract

© Copyright 2017 ASME. Diesel locomotives in heavy haul operations are good candidates to adopt energy storage systems (ESSs). This paper modelled a battery ESS and a flywheel ESS for heavy haul locomotives. Three heavy haul trains with different traction plans (diesel, diesel-flywheel, and diesel-battery) were compared. The diesel, flywheel, and battery locomotives have traction powers of 3100 kW, 2000 kW, and 3100 kW respectively. Available energy from the flywheel and battery ESSs are 500 kWh and 5000 kWh respectively. The simulated railway is about 300 km long while the trains are about 10,000 tonnes each. Traction performance and fuel consumption were compared. The results show that, compared with the diesel train, the diesel-flywheel and diesel-battery trains were 13.26% and 9.20% slower in speed respectively. However, they decreased their fuel consumptions by 12.40% and 20.65% respectively.

dc.titleSimulated comparison of energy storage systems for heavy haul locomotives
dc.typeConference Paper
dcterms.source.title2017 Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2017
dcterms.source.series2017 Joint Rail Conference, JRC 2017
dcterms.source.isbn9780791850718
curtin.departmentDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record