Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCollins, A.
dc.contributor.authorAlbrecht, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorWaltz, J.
dc.contributor.authorGold, J.
dc.contributor.authorFrank, M.
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-24T02:20:25Z
dc.date.available2017-08-24T02:20:25Z
dc.date.created2017-08-23T07:21:31Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationCollins, A. and Albrecht, M. and Waltz, J. and Gold, J. and Frank, M. 2016. Interactions Among Working Memory, Reinforcement Learning, and Effort in Value-Based Choice: A New Paradigm and Selective Deficits in Schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/55791
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.05.017
dc.description.abstract

© 2017 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Background: When studying learning, researchers directly observe only the participants' choices, which are often assumed to arise from a unitary learning process. However, a number of separable systems, such as working memory (WM) and reinforcement learning (RL), contribute simultaneously to human learning. Identifying each system's contributions is essential for mapping the neural substrates contributing in parallel to behavior; computational modeling can help to design tasks that allow such a separable identification of processes and infer their contributions in individuals. Methods: We present a new experimental protocol that separately identifies the contributions of RL and WM to learning, is sensitive to parametric variations in both, and allows us to investigate whether the processes interact. In experiments 1 and 2, we tested this protocol with healthy young adults ( n = 29 and n = 52, respectively). In experiment 3, we used it to investigate learning deficits in medicated individuals with schizophrenia ( n = 49 patients, n = 32 control subjects). Results: Experiments 1 and 2 established WM and RL contributions to learning, as evidenced by parametric modulations of choice by load and delay and reward history, respectively. They also showed interactions between WM and RL, where RL was enhanced under high WM load. Moreover, we observed a cost of mental effort when controlling for reinforcement history: participants preferred stimuli they encountered under low WM load. Experiment 3 revealed selective deficits in WM contributions and preserved RL value learning in individuals with schizophrenia compared with control subjects. Conclusions: Computational approaches allow us to disentangle contributions of multiple systems to learning and, consequently, to further our understanding of psychiatric diseases.

dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.titleInteractions Among Working Memory, Reinforcement Learning, and Effort in Value-Based Choice: A New Paradigm and Selective Deficits in Schizophrenia
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.issn0006-3223
dcterms.source.titleBiological Psychiatry
curtin.departmentSchool of Public Health
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record