Applicability of the 2013 ACC/AHA Risk Assessment and Cholesterol Treatment Guidelines in the real world: Results from a multiethnic case-control study
dc.contributor.author | Magnoni, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Berteotti, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Norata, Giuseppe | |
dc.contributor.author | Limite, L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Peretto, G. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cristell, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Maseri, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cianflone, D. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-24T02:21:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-24T02:21:02Z | |
dc.date.created | 2017-08-23T07:21:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Magnoni, M. and Berteotti, M. and Norata, G. and Limite, L. and Peretto, G. and Cristell, N. and Maseri, A. et al. 2016. Applicability of the 2013 ACC/AHA Risk Assessment and Cholesterol Treatment Guidelines in the real world: Results from a multiethnic case-control study. Annals of Medicine. 48 (4): pp. 282-292. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/55914 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3109/07853890.2016.1168934 | |
dc.description.abstract |
© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Background: The 2013 ACC/AHA cholesterol treatment guidelines have introduced a new cardiovascular risk assessment approach (PCE) and have revisited the threshold for prescribing statins. This study aims to compare the ex ante application of the ACC/AHA and the ATP-III guideline models by using a multiethnic case-control study. Methods: ATP-III-FRS and PCE were assessed in 739 patients with first STEMI and 739 age- and gender-matched controls; the proportion of cases and controls that would have been eligible for statin as primary prevention therapy and the discriminatory ability of both models were evaluated. Results: The application of the ACC/AHA compared to the ATP-III model, resulted in an increase in sensitivity [94% (95%CI: 91%-95%) vs. 65% (61%-68%), p < 0.0001], a reduction in specificity [19% (15%-22%) vs. 55% (51%-59%), p < 0.0001] with similar global accuracy [0.56 (0.53-0.59) vs.0.59 (0.57-0.63), p ns] . When stratifying for ethnicity, the accuracy of the ACC/AHA model was higher in Europeans than in Chinese (p = 0.003) and to identified premature STEMI patients within Europeans much better compared to the ATP-III model (p = 0.0289). Conclusion: The application of the ACC/AHA model resulted in a significant reduction of first STEMI patients who would have escaped from preventive treatment. Age and ethnicity affected the accuracy of the ACC/AHA model improving the identification of premature STEMI among Europeans only. Key messagesAccording to the ATP-III guideline model, about one-third of patients with STEMI would not be eligible for primary preventive treatment before STEMI.The application of the new ACC/AHA cholesterol treatment guideline model leads to a significant reduction of the percentage of patients with STEMI who would have been considered at lower risk before the STEMI.The global accuracy of the new ACC/AHA model is higher in the Europeans than in the Chinese and, moreover, among the Europeans, the application of the new ACC/AHA guideline model also improved identification of premature STEMI patients. | |
dc.title | Applicability of the 2013 ACC/AHA Risk Assessment and Cholesterol Treatment Guidelines in the real world: Results from a multiethnic case-control study | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dcterms.source.volume | 48 | |
dcterms.source.number | 4 | |
dcterms.source.startPage | 282 | |
dcterms.source.endPage | 292 | |
dcterms.source.issn | 0785-3890 | |
dcterms.source.title | Annals of Medicine | |
curtin.department | School of Biomedical Sciences | |
curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available |
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |