Putting the public first? An examination of the implications of the 2009 EAC report. Part two: Independent public schools
dc.contributor.author | Fitzgerald, Scott | |
dc.contributor.author | Rainnie, A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-08-24T02:21:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-08-24T02:21:35Z | |
dc.date.created | 2017-08-23T07:21:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Fitzgerald, S. and Rainnie, A. 2011. Putting the public first? An examination of the implications of the 2009 EAC report. Part two: Independent public schools, Curtin University of Technology, Curtin Graduate School of Business. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/55923 | |
dc.description.abstract |
Since at least the late 1990s, a significant body of research has established that ‘self-managing schools’ do not improve the quality of educational practices across the public education system or improve ‘student learning outcomes’ for all students. Indeed, it has been noted that on the contrary, for vast numbers of students, especially those who are already disadvantaged, this reform is coming to be seen as being extremely damaging. This outcome is clear in cases such as the Victorian, English and American education systems where self-managing schools have been most fully developed. | |
dc.publisher | UnionsWA | |
dc.title | Putting the public first? An examination of the implications of the 2009 EAC report. Part two: Independent public schools | |
dc.type | Report | |
dcterms.source.startPage | 1 | |
dcterms.source.endPage | 12 | |
curtin.department | Curtin Graduate School of Business | |
curtin.accessStatus | Fulltext not available |
Files in this item
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |