Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSauerwald, S.
dc.contributor.authorVan Oosterhout, H.
dc.contributor.authorVan Essen, M.
dc.contributor.authorPeng, Mike
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-24T02:22:12Z
dc.date.available2017-08-24T02:22:12Z
dc.date.created2017-08-23T07:21:46Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationSauerwald, S. and Van Oosterhout, H. and Van Essen, M. and Peng, M. 2015. Proxy advisors as gatekeepers of shareholder dissent: A cross-national investigation of influence and effectiveness, pp. 1025-1030.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/56051
dc.identifier.doi10.5465/AMBPP.2015.192
dc.description.abstract

Proxy advisors are information intermediaries that provide voting recommendations to shareholders. Drawing on agency theory and the comparative corporate governance literature, we find that firm internal monitoring mechanisms substitute for proxy advice, and that proxy advice is less influential and has a lower predictive quality in relationship-based corporate governance contexts.

dc.titleProxy advisors as gatekeepers of shareholder dissent: A cross-national investigation of influence and effectiveness
dc.typeConference Paper
dcterms.source.startPage1025
dcterms.source.endPage1030
dcterms.source.title75th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2015
dcterms.source.series75th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2015
curtin.departmentSchool of Management
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record