Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, B.
dc.contributor.authorFoong, Cheryl
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-27T10:21:09Z
dc.date.available2017-09-27T10:21:09Z
dc.date.created2017-09-27T09:48:11Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationFitzgerald, B. and Foong, C. 2013. Suppression orders after Fairfax v Ibrahim: Implications for internet communications. Australian Bar Review. 37: pp. 1-16.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/56851
dc.description.abstract

This article considers the scope for utilising suppression orders to prevent the risk of prejudice to the administration of justice, in light of the wide availability of internet communications. Drawing from principles articulated in the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal case, Fairfax v Ibrahim, this article will explain the form in which such orders may take, and the significance of the ‘notice and takedown’ procedure adopted by the court. The article will further outline the considerations (of specific interest to search engines and social media platforms) that a court will take into account in deciding whether a suppression order is necessary in the circumstances.

dc.relation.urihttps://ssrn.com/abstract=2485978
dc.titleSuppression orders after Fairfax v Ibrahim: Implications for internet communications
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume37
dcterms.source.startPage1
dcterms.source.endPage16
dcterms.source.titleAustralian Bar Review
curtin.departmentCurtin Law School
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record