Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSadler, Pauline
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T10:47:57Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T10:47:57Z
dc.date.created2008-11-12T23:20:56Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.citationSadler, Pauline. 2002. Occupiers' Liability in the Retail Industry. Legal Issues in Business 4: 23-28.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/5699
dc.description.abstract

When a customer is injured on the premises of a retailer, the retailer may be liable for damages. The cause of action is 'occupiers'liability', which since Australian Safeway Stores v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479 has been incorporated into the ordinary principles of negligence. This article examines the liability of retailers in the tort of negligence, with particular reference to the required standard of care. The Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic), Occupiers Liability Act 1985 (WA), and Wrongs Act 1936 (SA) are included in the discussion. Cases referred to include Wheat v Lacon [1966] AC 552, Rose v Abbey Orchard Property Investments Pty Ltd (1987) Aust Torts Reports 80-121, Drakos v Woolworths (SA) Ltd (1991) Aust Torts Reports 81-135, Kocis v SE Dickens Pty Ltd (t/as Coles New World Supermarket) (1996) Aust Torts Reports 81-382, Kelly v Lend Lease Retail (1993) Aust Torts Reports 81-216, Griffin v Coles Myer Ltd (1991) Aust Torts Reports 81109, Razic v Cruz [2000] NSWCA 66 and Daily v Spot-On Investments Pty Ltd t/as Spot-On Photos (1995) Aust Torts Reports 81-365.

dc.subjectoccupiers liability - negligence - Occupiers Liability Act 1985 (WA) - retailers - standards of care
dc.titleOccupiers' Liability in the Retail Industry
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume4
dcterms.source.startPage23
dcterms.source.endPage28
dcterms.source.titleLegal Issues in Business
curtin.identifierEPR-106
curtin.accessStatusOpen access
curtin.facultySchool of Business Law
curtin.facultyCurtin Business School


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record