Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJenkins, C.
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, S.
dc.contributor.authorDance, T.
dc.contributor.authorEnnis-King, J.
dc.contributor.authorGlubokovskikh, Stanislav
dc.contributor.authorGurevich, Boris
dc.contributor.authorLa Force, T.
dc.contributor.authorPaterson, L.
dc.contributor.authorPevzner, Roman
dc.contributor.authorTenthorey, E.
dc.contributor.authorWatson, M.
dc.identifier.citationJenkins, C. and Marshall, S. and Dance, T. and Ennis-King, J. and Glubokovskikh, S. and Gurevich, B. and La Force, T. et al. 2017. Validating Subsurface Monitoring as an Alternative Option to Surface M&V - The CO2CRC's Otway Stage 3 Injection. Energy Procedia. 114: pp. 3374-3384.

Future CO 2 storage projects will require Monitoring and Verification (M & V) operations at the CO 2 storage site to understand the behavior of the CO 2 plume, including the assurance that leakage of the CO 2 has not occurred. Current surface based monitoring technologies may be unable to yield sufficient resolution or accuracy. CO2CRC, in conjunction with its Australian partners, is developing the Otway Stage 3 Project to identify and validate sub-surface monitoring techniques and configurations as a key element of a risk-based M & V program in large scale CCS projects. Subsurface monitoring approaches will be tested on a plume of CO 2 from an array of monitoring wells. Primary monitoring methods will be pressure tomography and downhole seismic, although other modalities (gravity, electromagnetic) are also being considered.

dc.titleValidating Subsurface Monitoring as an Alternative Option to Surface M&V - The CO2CRC's Otway Stage 3 Injection
dc.typeConference Paper
dcterms.source.titleEnergy Procedia
dcterms.source.seriesEnergy Procedia
curtin.departmentDepartment of Exploration Geophysics
curtin.accessStatusOpen access

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as