Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKeane, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorYovich, John
dc.contributor.authorHamidi, Anahita
dc.contributor.authorHinchliffe, P.
dc.contributor.authorDhaliwal, Satvinder S.
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-20T08:48:50Z
dc.date.available2017-11-20T08:48:50Z
dc.date.created2017-11-20T08:13:37Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationKeane, K. and Yovich, J. and Hamidi, A. and Hinchliffe, P. and Dhaliwal, S. 2017. Single-centre retrospective analysis of growth hormone supplementation in IVF patients classified as poor-prognosis. BMJ Open. 7: e018107.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/57763
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018107
dc.description.abstract

Background Patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) receive various adjuvant therapies in order to enhance success rates, but the true benefit is actively debated. Growth hormone (GH) supplementation was assessed in poor-prognosis women undergoing fresh IVF transfer cycles. Methods Data were retrospectively analysed from 400 IVF cycles, where 161 women received GH and 239 did not. Results Clinical pregnancy, live birth rates and corresponding ORs and CIs were significantly greater with GH, despite patients being significantly older with lower ovarian reserve. Patient's age, quality of transferred embryo and GH were the only significant independent predictors of clinical pregnancy (OR: 0.90, 5.00 and 2.49, p < 0.002, respectively) and live birth chance (OR: 0.91, 3.90 and 4.75, p < 0.014, respectively). GH increased clinical pregnancy chance by 3.42-fold (95% CI 1.82 to 6.44, p < 0.0005) and live birth chance by 6.16-fold (95% CI 2.83 to 13.39, p < 0.0005) after adjustment for maternal age, antral follicle count and transferred embryo quality. Conclusion These data provided further evidence to indicate that GH may support more live births, particularly in younger women. It also appears that embryos generated under GH have a better implantation potential, but whether the biological mechanism is embryo-mediated or endometrium-mediated is unclear. © Article author(s) 2017.

dc.publisherBMJ Group
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.titleSingle-centre retrospective analysis of growth hormone supplementation in IVF patients classified as poor-prognosis
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume7
dcterms.source.number10
dcterms.source.issn2044-6055
dcterms.source.titleBMJ Open
curtin.departmentSchool of Biomedical Sciences
curtin.accessStatusOpen access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/