Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLove, Peter
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Jingyang
dc.contributor.authorMatthews, Jane
dc.contributor.authorSing, M.
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-24T05:24:27Z
dc.date.available2017-11-24T05:24:27Z
dc.date.created2017-11-24T04:48:44Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationLove, P. and Zhou, J. and Matthews, J. and Sing, M. 2016. Retrospective future proofing of a copper mine: Quantification of errors and omissions in ‘As-built’ documentation. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 43: pp. 414-423.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/58214
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jlp.2016.06.011
dc.description.abstract

© 2016 Elsevier LtdThe electrical instrumentation control systems (EICS) ‘As-built’ documentations of a copper mine were found to possess a significant errors and omissions, which hindered the asset owner's ability to undertake effective and efficient operations and maintenance. A Systems Information Model (SIM) was used to retrospectively create a connected system to ensure all physical equipment and the associated connections that were constructed are modelled in an object-orientated database. In creating the SIM, the existing errors and omissions in the ‘As-built’ documentation were quantified, and cost savings that could be achieved for a future planned copper mine, with a similar design, were identified. The limitations of using conventional computer-aided-design (CAD) to design and document EICS are discussed. It is recommended that retrospectively creating a SIM can provide owners and operators with significant productivity benefits as well as ensure the asset's integrity. The case study presented provides asset owners and operators with the empirical evidence to challenge conventional thinking surrounding the design, engineering and documentation of EICS using CAD and alternatively consider the use of SIM.

dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.urihttps://www.elsevier.com/
dc.titleRetrospective future proofing of a copper mine: Quantification of errors and omissions in ‘As-built’ documentation
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume43
dcterms.source.startPage414
dcterms.source.endPage423
dcterms.source.issn0950-4230
dcterms.source.titleJournal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
curtin.departmentDepartment of Civil Engineering
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record