View Item 

Comparative analysis of h.264 and motion-jpeg2000 compression for video telemetry

Access Status
Fulltext not available
Authors
Hallamasek, K.
Hallamasek, K.
Schwagler, B.
Oxley, Leslie
Date
2012
Type
Conference Paper

Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
Hallamasek, K. and Hallamasek, K. and Schwagler, B. and Oxley, L. 2012. Comparative analysis of h.264 and motion-jpeg2000 compression for video telemetry.
Source Title
Proceedings of the International Telemetering Conference
ISSN
School
School of Economics and Finance
URI
Collection
Abstract

The H.264/AVC standard, popular in commercial video recording and distribution, has also been widely adopted for high-definition video compression in Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance and for Flight Test applications. H.264/AVC is the most modern and bandwidth-efficient compression algorithm specified for video recording in the Digital Recording IRIG Standard 106-11, Chapter 10. This bandwidth efficiency is largely derived from the inter-frame compression component of the standard. Motion JPEG-2000 compression is often considered for cockpit display recording, due to the concern that details in the symbols and graphics suffer excessively from artifacts of inter-frame compression and that critical information might be lost. In this paper, we report on a quantitative comparison of H.264/AVC and Motion JPEG-2000 encoding for HD video telemetry. Actual encoder implementations in video recorder products are used for the comparison. © International Foundation For Telemetering, 2012.