Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAgutu, N.
dc.contributor.authorAwange, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorZerihun, Ayalsew
dc.contributor.authorNdehedehe, C.
dc.contributor.authorKuhn, Michael
dc.contributor.authorFukuda, Y.
dc.identifier.citationAgutu, N. and Awange, J. and Zerihun, A. and Ndehedehe, C. and Kuhn, M. and Fukuda, Y. 2017. Assessing multi-satellite remote sensing, reanalysis, and land surface models’ products in characterizing agricultural drought in East Africa. Remote Sensing of Environment. 194: pp. 287-302.

© 2017 Elsevier Inc. Heavy reliance of East Africa (EA) on rain-fed agriculture makes it vulnerable to drought-induced famine. Yet, most resear ch on EA drought focuses on meteorological aspects with little attention paid on agricultural drought impacts. The inadequacy of in-situ rainfall data across EA has also hampered detailed agricultural drought impact analysis. Recently, however, there has been increased data availability from remote sensing (rainfall, vegetation condition index – VCI, terrestrial water storage – TWS), reanalysis (soil moisture and TWS), and land surface models (soil moisture). Here, these products were employed to characterise EA droughts between 1983 and 2013 in terms of severity, duration, and spatial extent. Furthermore, the capability of these products to capture agricultural drought impacts was assessed using maize and wheat production data. Our results show that while all products were similar in drought characterisation in dry areas, the similarity of CHIRPS and GPCC extended over the whole EA. CHIRPS and GPCC also identified the highest proportion of areas under drought followed closely by soil moisture products whereas VCI had the least coverage. Drought onset was marked first by a decline/lack of rainfall, followed by VCI/soil moisture, and then TWS. VCI indicated drought lag at 0–4 months following rainfall while soil moisture and TWS products had variable lags vis-à-vis rainfall. GLDAS mischaracterized the 2005–2006 drought vis-à-vis other soil moisture products. Based on the annual crop production variabilities explained, we identified CHIRPS, GPCC, FLDAS, and VCI as suitable for agricultural drought monitoring/characterization in the region for the study period. Finally, GLDAS explained the lowest percentages of the Kenyan and Ugandan annual crop production variances. These findings are important for the gauge data deficient EA region as they provide alternatives for monitoring agricultural drought.

dc.titleAssessing multi-satellite remote sensing, reanalysis, and land surface models’ products in characterizing agricultural drought in East Africa
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.titleRemote Sensing of Environment
curtin.departmentDepartment of Spatial Sciences
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record