Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLove, Peter
dc.contributor.authorAhiaga-Dagbui, D.
dc.contributor.authorWelde, M.
dc.contributor.authorOdeck, J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-24T05:26:38Z
dc.date.available2017-11-24T05:26:38Z
dc.date.created2017-11-24T04:48:45Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationLove, P. and Ahiaga-Dagbui, D. and Welde, M. and Odeck, J. 2017. Light rail transit cost performance: Opportunities for future-proofing. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 100: pp. 27-39.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/58612
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.002
dc.description.abstract

© 2017 Elsevier Ltd The cost performance of Light Rail Transit (LRT) systems have been scrutinized by the popular press and public sector infrastructure agencies as they have been prone to incurring cost increases in their capital expenditures (CAPEX). In tackling such increases, emphasis is placed on mitigating strategic misrepresentation and optimism bias, which has hindered the public sectors ability to embrace innovation, particularly with regard to the justification and adoption of LRT. More often than not, operational expenditure (OPEX) is neglected, and is not considered a part of the transportation cost performance literature. The aim of this paper is to examine the equivocality that surrounds the determination of cost performance of LRT projects. It is suggested that the public sector should move beyond focusing on strategic misrepresentation and optimism bias, as many governments worldwide now have in place mechanisms to address such issues, and instead focus on future-proofing their assets. It is suggested that the key enablers of future-proofing LRT are (1) private finance; (2) delivery strategy (e.g. design-build-finance-operate); (3) digitization (e.g. building information modelling); and (4) asset management (e.g. smart technologies). If the public sector is to provide an LRT system that is cost effective and able to respond to the demands imposed by climate change, then it needs to be considered from a life-cycle perspective and funding sought from the private sector to ensure its viability.

dc.publisherPergamon Press
dc.relation.sponsoredbyhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP160102882
dc.titleLight rail transit cost performance: Opportunities for future-proofing
dc.typeJournal Article
dcterms.source.volume100
dcterms.source.startPage27
dcterms.source.endPage39
dcterms.source.issn0965-8564
dcterms.source.titleTransportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
curtin.departmentDepartment of Civil Engineering
curtin.accessStatusFulltext not available


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record