Shift work that involves circadian disruption and breast cancer: a first application of chronobiological theory and the consequent challenges.
MetadataShow full item record
Objectives: In 2007, the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified shift work involving circadian disruption (CD) as probably carcinogenic to humans. Circadian disruption could be conceptualised as the overlap of activity, such as work, with an individual's biological night. The latter can be approximated from a worker's chronotype (or morning/evening preference). Few previous studies have taken chronotype into account when assessing CD caused by shift work. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that women working during their biological night would be at increased risk of breast cancer. Methods: We used data from our case-control study of breast cancer to investigate associations between shift work involving CD and breast cancer risks. Previously, we had assumed that everyone working in jobs which involved work for two or more shifts between midnight and 05:00 hours was equally exposed to CD. In the present analyses, we reclassified as unexposed those who had a late chronotype in which their preferred bedtime was 2 hours after the end of their shift. RESULTS: Only 30 of 1385 night jobs changed classification and the overall finding (OR 1.17, 95%CI 0.98 to 1.41) was not different to the original finding when chronotype was not considered. Conclusions: We found virtually no difference between our new and old classifications of exposure. However, we were not able to calculate the total number of chronodisrupted shifts over a lifetime in order to assess dose and nor were we able to determine how many women were exposed to CD when doing shifts which began before midnight. Our first practical application highlights challenges for future chronobiology-based research.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Considerations of circadian impact for defining 'shift work' in cancer studies: IARC Working Group ReportStevens, R.; Hansen, J.; Costa, G.; Haus, E.; Kauppinen, T.; Aronson, K.; Castaño-Vinyals, G.; Davis, S.; Frings-Dresen, M.; Fritschi, Lin; Kogevinas, M.; Kogi, K.; Lie, J.; Lowden, A.; Peplonska, B.; Pesch, B.; Pukkala, E.; Schernhammer, E.; Travis, R.; Vermeulen, R.; Zheng, T.; Cogliano, V.; Straif, K. (2011)Based on the idea that electric light at night might account for a portion of the high and rising risk of breast cancer worldwide, it was predicted long ago that women working a non-day shift would be at higher risk ...
Fritschi, Lin; Erren, T.; Glass, D.; Girschik, J.; Thomson, A.; Saunders, C.; Boyle, T.; El-Zaemey, S.; Rogers, P.; Peters, S.; Slevin, Terry; D'Orsogna, A.; de Vocht, F.; Vermeulen, R.; Heyworth, J. (2013)Background: Research on the possible association between shiftwork and breast cancer is complicated because there are many different shiftwork factors, which might be involved including: light at night, phase shift, sleep ...
Self-reported shift work, recall bias, and belief about disease causation in a case-control study of breast cancerLizama, N.; Heyworth, J.; Thomson, Allyson; Slevin, Terry; Fritschi, Lin (2017)© 2017 Elsevier Ltd Background Recall bias is a potential source of misclassification in case-control studies. Studies have shown that the association between exposure and disease can differ according to participants’ ...